国际医药卫生导报
國際醫藥衛生導報
국제의약위생도보
INTERNATIONAL MEDICINE & HEALTH GUIDANCE NEWS
2014年
10期
1358-1360
,共3页
临床效果%无托槽隐形矫治%牙周病学%前牙间隙
臨床效果%無託槽隱形矯治%牙週病學%前牙間隙
림상효과%무탁조은형교치%아주병학%전아간극
Clinical efficacy%Invisible orthodontic correction without bracket%Periodontal disease%Anterior tooth space
目的 探讨牙周病致前牙间隙进行无托槽隐形矫治的临床效果.方法 选择2012年1月至2013年6月我院收治的牙周病致前牙间隙患者80例,按治疗方法分为治疗组和对照组,各40例.治疗组采用无托槽隐形矫治疗法,对照组采用常规固定矫治疗法.比较两组临床效果、探诊深度、菌斑指数、前牙间隙关闭时间等各项参数指标变化.结果 治疗后,两组患者前牙间隙、牙齿松动、1-NA距、1-NA角均有显著改善,但治疗组各项临床指标显著优于对照组(P＜0.05);治疗后,两组患者探诊深度均显著提升,但治疗组探诊深度[(1.69±0.26) mm]提升幅度显著高于对照组[(1.56±0.18) mm](P＜0.05);治疗后,治疗组菌斑指数(9.8％)、前牙间隙关闭时间[(2.0±0.9)月]、矫治器松动(0)情况显著优于对照组(P＜0.05).结论 牙周病致前牙间隙进行无托槽隐形矫治,短期观察未见牙周组织损伤,临床效果确切,适用于轻中度牙周病致前牙间隙的患者,值得临床推广.
目的 探討牙週病緻前牙間隙進行無託槽隱形矯治的臨床效果.方法 選擇2012年1月至2013年6月我院收治的牙週病緻前牙間隙患者80例,按治療方法分為治療組和對照組,各40例.治療組採用無託槽隱形矯治療法,對照組採用常規固定矯治療法.比較兩組臨床效果、探診深度、菌斑指數、前牙間隙關閉時間等各項參數指標變化.結果 治療後,兩組患者前牙間隙、牙齒鬆動、1-NA距、1-NA角均有顯著改善,但治療組各項臨床指標顯著優于對照組(P＜0.05);治療後,兩組患者探診深度均顯著提升,但治療組探診深度[(1.69±0.26) mm]提升幅度顯著高于對照組[(1.56±0.18) mm](P＜0.05);治療後,治療組菌斑指數(9.8％)、前牙間隙關閉時間[(2.0±0.9)月]、矯治器鬆動(0)情況顯著優于對照組(P＜0.05).結論 牙週病緻前牙間隙進行無託槽隱形矯治,短期觀察未見牙週組織損傷,臨床效果確切,適用于輕中度牙週病緻前牙間隙的患者,值得臨床推廣.
목적 탐토아주병치전아간극진행무탁조은형교치적림상효과.방법 선택2012년1월지2013년6월아원수치적아주병치전아간극환자80례,안치료방법분위치료조화대조조,각40례.치료조채용무탁조은형교치요법,대조조채용상규고정교치요법.비교량조림상효과、탐진심도、균반지수、전아간극관폐시간등각항삼수지표변화.결과 치료후,량조환자전아간극、아치송동、1-NA거、1-NA각균유현저개선,단치료조각항림상지표현저우우대조조(P＜0.05);치료후,량조환자탐진심도균현저제승,단치료조탐진심도[(1.69±0.26) mm]제승폭도현저고우대조조[(1.56±0.18) mm](P＜0.05);치료후,치료조균반지수(9.8％)、전아간극관폐시간[(2.0±0.9)월]、교치기송동(0)정황현저우우대조조(P＜0.05).결론 아주병치전아간극진행무탁조은형교치,단기관찰미견아주조직손상,림상효과학절,괄용우경중도아주병치전아간극적환자,치득림상추엄.
Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of invisible orthodontic correction without bracket for anterior tooth space caused by periodontal disease.Methods 80 patients with anterior tooth space caused by periodontal disease were selected from our hospital from January,2012 to June,2013 and then were divided into a treatment group and a control group according to different treatments,40 cases for each group.The treatment group were treated with invisible orthodontic correction without bracket,while the control group with routine fixed orthodontic correction.The clinical efficacies,probing depths,plaque indexes,times for closing front tooth gap,and the changes of other parameters in the two groups were compared.Results After the treatment,the anterior tooth gap,tooth looseness,1-NA distance,and 1-NA angle were significantly improved in both groups,but the clinical indicators of the treatment group were significantly better than that of the control group (P ＜ 0.05); the probing depth was significantly improved in both groups,but the lifting amplitude of the probing depth were significantly higher in the treatment group ([1.69 ± 0.26] mm) than in the control group ([1.56-± 0.18] mm) (P ＜ 0.05) ; the plaque index (9.8％),time for closing front tooth gap ([2.0 ± 0.9] months),and appliance looseness (0) were significantly better in the treatment group than in the control group (P ＜ 0.05).Conclusions Invisible orthodontic correction without bracket for anterior tooth space caused by periodontal disease doesn' t injury periodontal tissue in short term and is effective,suitable for the mild to moderate patients,and is worth being clinically generalized.
