河北医科大学学报
河北醫科大學學報
하북의과대학학보
JOURNAL OF HEBEI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY
2014年
6期
668-672
,共5页
朱倩%张雨洁%田鸣%崔凌利
硃倩%張雨潔%田鳴%崔凌利
주천%장우길%전명%최릉리
依托咪酯%二异丙酚%麻醉,全身%血流动力学
依託咪酯%二異丙酚%痳醉,全身%血流動力學
의탁미지%이이병분%마취,전신%혈류동역학
etomidate%propofol%anesthesia,general%hemodynamics
目的:观察脑电双频指数( bispectral index,BIS)监测下依托咪酯复合丙泊酚用于老年患者气管插管全麻诱导时的血流动力学变化。方法100例老年患者根据全麻诱导药物不同分为2组,丙泊酚( P)组、依托咪酯( E)组、以及联合用药1、2、3( PE1、PE2、PE3)组,观察诱导前( T0),置喉镜前( T1),插管即刻( T2),插管后1、3、5、10min(T3~T6)的收缩压(systolic blood pressure,SBP)、舒张压(diastolic blood pressure,DBP)、平均动脉压(mean arterial pressure,MAP)、心率( heart rate,HR)及BIS值;并记录全麻诱导期间不良反应的发生率。结果与T0时比较,2组在T1时SBP、DBP、MAP、HR 均明显下降( P <0.05);T2时 P 组、PE2组 SBP、DBP、MAP 明显下降( P <0.05),PE1组DBP、MAP、HR差异均无统计学意义( P>0.05);T3时P组、E组、PE1组SBP、DBP、MAP差异均无统计学意义( P>0.05),E组与PE3组的HR显著上升( P<0.05)。E组在T1~T3时的SBP、DBP、MAP以及T3时HR明显高于P组(P<0.05);PE1组在T1~T4时的SBP、DBP、MAP明显高于P组(P<0.05),T3时HR低于E组(P<0.05);PE2组在各时间点SBP、DBP、MAP、HR与P组比较差异均无统计学意义( P>0.05);PE3组在T1~T6时SBP、DBP、MAP、HR均明显高于P组(P<0.05)。2组BIS较诱导前有明显下降,组间比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论与单独用药比,依托咪酯0.15mg/kg联合丙泊酚0.8mg/kg可更好维持气管插管全麻诱导期间的血流动力学稳定。
目的:觀察腦電雙頻指數( bispectral index,BIS)鑑測下依託咪酯複閤丙泊酚用于老年患者氣管插管全痳誘導時的血流動力學變化。方法100例老年患者根據全痳誘導藥物不同分為2組,丙泊酚( P)組、依託咪酯( E)組、以及聯閤用藥1、2、3( PE1、PE2、PE3)組,觀察誘導前( T0),置喉鏡前( T1),插管即刻( T2),插管後1、3、5、10min(T3~T6)的收縮壓(systolic blood pressure,SBP)、舒張壓(diastolic blood pressure,DBP)、平均動脈壓(mean arterial pressure,MAP)、心率( heart rate,HR)及BIS值;併記錄全痳誘導期間不良反應的髮生率。結果與T0時比較,2組在T1時SBP、DBP、MAP、HR 均明顯下降( P <0.05);T2時 P 組、PE2組 SBP、DBP、MAP 明顯下降( P <0.05),PE1組DBP、MAP、HR差異均無統計學意義( P>0.05);T3時P組、E組、PE1組SBP、DBP、MAP差異均無統計學意義( P>0.05),E組與PE3組的HR顯著上升( P<0.05)。E組在T1~T3時的SBP、DBP、MAP以及T3時HR明顯高于P組(P<0.05);PE1組在T1~T4時的SBP、DBP、MAP明顯高于P組(P<0.05),T3時HR低于E組(P<0.05);PE2組在各時間點SBP、DBP、MAP、HR與P組比較差異均無統計學意義( P>0.05);PE3組在T1~T6時SBP、DBP、MAP、HR均明顯高于P組(P<0.05)。2組BIS較誘導前有明顯下降,組間比較差異均無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論與單獨用藥比,依託咪酯0.15mg/kg聯閤丙泊酚0.8mg/kg可更好維持氣管插管全痳誘導期間的血流動力學穩定。
목적:관찰뇌전쌍빈지수( bispectral index,BIS)감측하의탁미지복합병박분용우노년환자기관삽관전마유도시적혈류동역학변화。방법100례노년환자근거전마유도약물불동분위2조,병박분( P)조、의탁미지( E)조、이급연합용약1、2、3( PE1、PE2、PE3)조,관찰유도전( T0),치후경전( T1),삽관즉각( T2),삽관후1、3、5、10min(T3~T6)적수축압(systolic blood pressure,SBP)、서장압(diastolic blood pressure,DBP)、평균동맥압(mean arterial pressure,MAP)、심솔( heart rate,HR)급BIS치;병기록전마유도기간불량반응적발생솔。결과여T0시비교,2조재T1시SBP、DBP、MAP、HR 균명현하강( P <0.05);T2시 P 조、PE2조 SBP、DBP、MAP 명현하강( P <0.05),PE1조DBP、MAP、HR차이균무통계학의의( P>0.05);T3시P조、E조、PE1조SBP、DBP、MAP차이균무통계학의의( P>0.05),E조여PE3조적HR현저상승( P<0.05)。E조재T1~T3시적SBP、DBP、MAP이급T3시HR명현고우P조(P<0.05);PE1조재T1~T4시적SBP、DBP、MAP명현고우P조(P<0.05),T3시HR저우E조(P<0.05);PE2조재각시간점SBP、DBP、MAP、HR여P조비교차이균무통계학의의( P>0.05);PE3조재T1~T6시SBP、DBP、MAP、HR균명현고우P조(P<0.05)。2조BIS교유도전유명현하강,조간비교차이균무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론여단독용약비,의탁미지0.15mg/kg연합병박분0.8mg/kg가경호유지기관삽관전마유도기간적혈류동역학은정。
Objective To observe the hemodynamic changes of anesthesia inducement of etomidate combined with propofol in elderly patients during general anesthesia. Methods Total 100 elderly patients with general anesthesia were randomly divided into five groups of propofol( group P ), etomidate( group E ),propofol combined with etomidate 1( group PE1 ),2( group PE2 )and 3( group PE3 )according inducement agents. The systolic blood pressure( SBP),diastolic blood pressure( DBP), mean arterial pressure( MAP),heart rate( HR)and bispectral index( BIS)value were recorded before inducement of anesthesia( T0 ),before laryngoscope insertion( T1 ),instant( T2 ),1min( T3 ),3min (T4),5min(T5)and 10(T6)min after intubation in each groups. Results Compared with T0,SBP, DBP,MAP and HR at T1 were significantly reduced in five groups(P<0. 05);SBP,DBP and MAP were significantly reduced in group P and PE2(P<0. 05),and DBP,MAP,HR in group PE1 were not different from that of at T2(P>0. 05);SBP,DBP and MAP in group P,E and PE1 were not different from that of at T3(P>0. 05),HR in group E and group PE3 were significantly elevated(P <0. 05). SBP,DBP and MAP at T1 -T3 and HR at T3 in group E were significantly higher than that in group P( P <0. 05 );SBP,DBP and MAP in group PE1 at T1 -T4 were higher than that in group P(P<0. 05),and HR at T3 in group PE1 was lower than that in group E(P<0. 05);At all the time point,SBP,DBP,MAP and HR in group PE2 were not different from those in group P(P>0. 05);SBP,DBP,MAP and HR in group PE3 at T1 -T6 were higher than those in group P(P<0. 05). BIS values in five groups decreased significantly after inducement( P <0. 05 ),and there were no significant changes between groups( P >0. 05 ). Conclusion Administration of propofol 0 . 8 mg/kg combined with etomidate 0 . 15 mg/kg can achieve more stable hemodynamic changes than administration of the two agents individually.