CAJ | 학술논문

“情况说明”随着司法实践的需要应运而生，从“两个证据规定”开始，刑事诉讼的规范层面开始将其纳入法条，然而在接下来包括2013年《刑事诉讼法》和《高检规则》等规范中，“情况说明”的证据能力一直摇摆在承认与否定之间。在理论的维度里，关于“情况说明”是否具有证据能力的讨论从未终止。反对者的观点太过注重证据的法定形式，且“一刀切”的做法太过武断。赞同者将“情况说明”进行类型化分析，可以有助于把握每一类“情况说明”的特点，然而“相对否定派”和“相对肯定派”在对待“程序类情况说明”和“证据类情况说明”的证据能力时出现了分歧，其中“相对否定派”未能准确把握刑事诉讼证明对象的范围。
“정황설명”수착사법실천적수요응운이생，종“량개증거규정”개시，형사소송적규범층면개시장기납입법조，연이재접하래포괄2013년《형사소송법》화《고검규칙》등규범중，“정황설명”적증거능력일직요파재승인여부정지간。재이론적유도리，관우“정황설명”시부구유증거능력적토론종미종지。반대자적관점태과주중증거적법정형식，차“일도절”적주법태과무단。찬동자장“정황설명”진행류형화분석，가이유조우파악매일류“정황설명”적특점，연이“상대부정파”화“상대긍정파”재대대“정서류정황설명”화“증거류정황설명”적증거능력시출현료분기，기중“상대부정파”미능준학파악형사소송증명대상적범위。
"Information note"appears with the demand of judicial practice .It is in the statutes of "two evi-dence rules"that "information note"has been a part of provisions for the first time .However , since the Criminal Procedure of 2013 and the judicial rules by Supreme People's Procuratorate issued , the credibility of "information note"has always been uncertain between positive and negative .In the theory research , the debate of the credibility of "information note"has never stopped .While the objectors whose sweeping approach to"information note"turns out to be crude put too much emphasis on the legal form of evidence , the approvers take a categorization analysis on the"information note", which is helpful to grasp the character of each "information note".And among the approv-ers, the"relative negative branch"whose attitude on the credibility of "procedural information note"and"eviden-tial information note"differs from the "relative positive branch"fails to understand the accurate scope of objects of proof in criminal procedure .