医学理论与实践
醫學理論與實踐
의학이론여실천
The Journal of Medical Theory and Practice
2014年
10期
1274-1276
,共3页
地中海贫血%HbA2%MCV%MCH%MCHC%RDW-SD
地中海貧血%HbA2%MCV%MCH%MCHC%RDW-SD
지중해빈혈%HbA2%MCV%MCH%MCHC%RDW-SD
Thalassemia%HbA2%MCV%MCH%MCHC%RDW-SD
目的:探讨血液学指标MCV、MCH、MCHC、RDW-SD、HbA2在地中海贫血筛查中的价值。方法:以基因诊断结果为金标准,分析189例地中海贫血患者(α地贫142例,β地贫47例)的血液学检测指标,建立相应的截断值,比较单独与联合应用血液学指标筛查地贫的灵敏度、特异度。结果:地贫患者与健康人MCV、MCH、MCHC、RDW-SD有明显差异(P<0.01),MCV、MCH、MCHC、RDW-SD 筛查地贫的截断值分别为71.90fL、23.85pg、333.50g/L、37.65fL ,灵敏度分别为91.40%、86.30%、52.40%、78.60%;HbA2在α地贫患者与健康人之间无差异(P>0.05), HbA2在β地贫患者与健康人之间有明显差异(P<0.01),HbA2筛查α地贫的截断值为2.45%,灵敏度为41.50%, HbA2筛查β地贫的截断值为3.25%,灵敏度为91.50%;MCV+MCH平行联合与MCV单独筛查α、β地贫的灵敏度与特异度均无明显差异(P>0.05);HbA2+MCV平行联合筛查α地贫的灵敏度明显高于 HbA2单独诊断α地贫(P<0.01),HbA2+MCV平行联合筛查β地贫特异度明显低于HbA2单独诊断β地贫(P<0.01)。结论:MCV筛查地贫灵敏度高;HbA2筛查β地贫的灵敏度高;HbA2+MCV平行联合可以提高筛查α地贫的灵敏度,减少漏检。
目的:探討血液學指標MCV、MCH、MCHC、RDW-SD、HbA2在地中海貧血篩查中的價值。方法:以基因診斷結果為金標準,分析189例地中海貧血患者(α地貧142例,β地貧47例)的血液學檢測指標,建立相應的截斷值,比較單獨與聯閤應用血液學指標篩查地貧的靈敏度、特異度。結果:地貧患者與健康人MCV、MCH、MCHC、RDW-SD有明顯差異(P<0.01),MCV、MCH、MCHC、RDW-SD 篩查地貧的截斷值分彆為71.90fL、23.85pg、333.50g/L、37.65fL ,靈敏度分彆為91.40%、86.30%、52.40%、78.60%;HbA2在α地貧患者與健康人之間無差異(P>0.05), HbA2在β地貧患者與健康人之間有明顯差異(P<0.01),HbA2篩查α地貧的截斷值為2.45%,靈敏度為41.50%, HbA2篩查β地貧的截斷值為3.25%,靈敏度為91.50%;MCV+MCH平行聯閤與MCV單獨篩查α、β地貧的靈敏度與特異度均無明顯差異(P>0.05);HbA2+MCV平行聯閤篩查α地貧的靈敏度明顯高于 HbA2單獨診斷α地貧(P<0.01),HbA2+MCV平行聯閤篩查β地貧特異度明顯低于HbA2單獨診斷β地貧(P<0.01)。結論:MCV篩查地貧靈敏度高;HbA2篩查β地貧的靈敏度高;HbA2+MCV平行聯閤可以提高篩查α地貧的靈敏度,減少漏檢。
목적:탐토혈액학지표MCV、MCH、MCHC、RDW-SD、HbA2재지중해빈혈사사중적개치。방법:이기인진단결과위금표준,분석189례지중해빈혈환자(α지빈142례,β지빈47례)적혈액학검측지표,건립상응적절단치,비교단독여연합응용혈액학지표사사지빈적령민도、특이도。결과:지빈환자여건강인MCV、MCH、MCHC、RDW-SD유명현차이(P<0.01),MCV、MCH、MCHC、RDW-SD 사사지빈적절단치분별위71.90fL、23.85pg、333.50g/L、37.65fL ,령민도분별위91.40%、86.30%、52.40%、78.60%;HbA2재α지빈환자여건강인지간무차이(P>0.05), HbA2재β지빈환자여건강인지간유명현차이(P<0.01),HbA2사사α지빈적절단치위2.45%,령민도위41.50%, HbA2사사β지빈적절단치위3.25%,령민도위91.50%;MCV+MCH평행연합여MCV단독사사α、β지빈적령민도여특이도균무명현차이(P>0.05);HbA2+MCV평행연합사사α지빈적령민도명현고우 HbA2단독진단α지빈(P<0.01),HbA2+MCV평행연합사사β지빈특이도명현저우HbA2단독진단β지빈(P<0.01)。결론:MCV사사지빈령민도고;HbA2사사β지빈적령민도고;HbA2+MCV평행연합가이제고사사α지빈적령민도,감소루검。
Objective :To explore the value of hematology indexes MCV ,MCH ,MCHC ,RDW-SD ,HbA2 in thalassae-mia screening .Methods :The hematology indexes of 189 cases of thalassemia(142 cases of α-thalassemia and 47 cases ofβ-thalassemia) were analyzed by gold standard of gene diagnosis .Set up a corresponding cutoff value .Comparing the sensitivity and specific degrees of single and combined use of hematology indexes screening thalassemia .Results :Thalas-semia and healthy people had significant difference in MCV ,MCH ,MCHC and RDW-SD(P<0 .01) ,the cutoff value of MCV ,MCHC ,MCH and RDW-SD for screening thalassemia were 71 .90fL ,23 .85pg ,333 .50g/L and 37 .65fL ,respec-tively .The sensitivity of MCV ,MCH ,MCHC and RDW-SD for screening thalassemia were 91 .40% ,86 .30% , 52.40% ,78 .60% ,respectively .HbA2 between α-thalassemia and healthy people had no difference (P> 0.05) .HbA2 betweenβ-thalassemia and healthy people had significant difference (P<0 .01) .The screening α-thalassemia cutoff of HbA2 was 2 .45% ,the sensitivity was 41 .50% .The screeningβ-thalassemia cutoff of HbA2 was 3.25% ,the sensitivi-ty was 91 .50% .The sensitivity and specificity of MCV + MCH combined and MCV alone screening α,β-thalassemia were not significantly different (P>0 .05) .The sensitivity of HbA2 +MCV combined screening α-thalassemia was sig-nificantly higher than HbA2 alone (P<0 .01) .The specificity of HbA2 + MCV combined screening β-thalassemia was significantly lower than HbA2 alone (P<0 .01) .Conclusion:MCV screening thalassemia value is higher ,HbA2 screen-ing β-thalassemia value is higher ,HbA2 + MCV parallel combination can improve the sensitivity of screening α-thalas-semia and reduce leak detection .