CAJ | 학술논문

目的：对膝关节损伤磁共振与关节镜结果进行对比分析。方法：收集我院2012年10月～2013年10月期间诊治的膝关节损伤患者44例作为研究对象，采用回顾性的方式分析患者的临床资料，对比分析磁共振与关节镜检查结果。结果：对比2种检测结果发现，磁共振在诊断前交叉韧带、膝内侧副韧带、膝外侧副韧带中出现了3例假阳性情况，磁共振在膝关节韧带损伤的灵敏度为100．0％，特异度为95．4％，符合率为96．8％。结论：磁共振检查膝关节损伤具有很高的灵敏度、特异性和符合率，关节镜检查相对较差，可作为膝关节损伤的筛查方式。
목적：대슬관절손상자공진여관절경결과진행대비분석。방법：수집아원2012년10월～2013년10월기간진치적슬관절손상환자44례작위연구대상，채용회고성적방식분석환자적림상자료，대비분석자공진여관절경검사결과。결과：대비2충검측결과발현，자공진재진단전교차인대、슬내측부인대、슬외측부인대중출현료3례가양성정황，자공진재슬관절인대손상적령민도위100．0％，특이도위95．4％，부합솔위96．8％。결론：자공진검사슬관절손상구유흔고적령민도、특이성화부합솔，관절경검사상대교차，가작위슬관절손상적사사방식。
Objective:To make a comparative analysis of magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy of knee joint injury results . Methods:in our hospital from 2012 October -2013 year in October during the diagnosis and treatment of patients with knee injury in 44 cases as the object of study , a retrospective analysis of clinical data of patients of the way , the analysis of magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopic findings contrast .Result:s the results of two kinds of detection , magnetic resonance cross appeared 3 false positive cases liga-ment, medial collateral ligament , knee lateral collateral ligament in the diagnosis , magnetic resonance in the sensitivity of the ligament in-jury of the knee joint was 100%, the specificity was 95.4%, the coincidence rate is 96.8%.Conclusion:MRI knee injury has a very high sensitivity , specificity and coincidence , arthroscopy relatively poor , can be used as a screening method of knee joint injury .