中国社区医师
中國社區醫師
중국사구의사
Chinese Community Doctors
2014年
15期
27-28
,共2页
老年%肺心病%冠心病%规范方案%治疗效果
老年%肺心病%冠心病%規範方案%治療效果
노년%폐심병%관심병%규범방안%치료효과
Elderly%pulmonary heart disease%Coronary heart disease%Standard solution%Treatment effect
目的：观察老年肺心病合并冠心病患者应用规范方案治疗的临床效果，探讨规范方案的临床应用价值。方法：收治肺心病合并冠心病老年患者120例，按随机数字表法分组，对照组给予氧疗、抗感染、祛痰等常规治疗措施，试验组患者应用规范性方案治疗，比较两组老年患者临床疗效。结果：与对照组相比，试验组冠心病合并肺心病老年患者的治疗效果更佳，试验组PaO2、PaCO2分别为(69.47±8.47)mmHg、(47.52±10.13)mmHg，临床治疗有效率93.3%，优于对照组的(60.54±9.41)mmHg、(57.54±9.64)mmHg，临床治疗有效率78.3%。经统计学处理，两组差异存在统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论：采用规范方案治疗老年肺心病合并冠心病患者，临床效果显著，值得在各级医院应用、推广。
目的：觀察老年肺心病閤併冠心病患者應用規範方案治療的臨床效果，探討規範方案的臨床應用價值。方法：收治肺心病閤併冠心病老年患者120例，按隨機數字錶法分組，對照組給予氧療、抗感染、祛痰等常規治療措施，試驗組患者應用規範性方案治療，比較兩組老年患者臨床療效。結果：與對照組相比，試驗組冠心病閤併肺心病老年患者的治療效果更佳，試驗組PaO2、PaCO2分彆為(69.47±8.47)mmHg、(47.52±10.13)mmHg，臨床治療有效率93.3%，優于對照組的(60.54±9.41)mmHg、(57.54±9.64)mmHg，臨床治療有效率78.3%。經統計學處理，兩組差異存在統計學意義(P＜0.05)。結論：採用規範方案治療老年肺心病閤併冠心病患者，臨床效果顯著，值得在各級醫院應用、推廣。
목적：관찰노년폐심병합병관심병환자응용규범방안치료적림상효과，탐토규범방안적림상응용개치。방법：수치폐심병합병관심병노년환자120례，안수궤수자표법분조，대조조급여양료、항감염、거담등상규치료조시，시험조환자응용규범성방안치료，비교량조노년환자림상료효。결과：여대조조상비，시험조관심병합병폐심병노년환자적치료효과경가，시험조PaO2、PaCO2분별위(69.47±8.47)mmHg、(47.52±10.13)mmHg，림상치료유효솔93.3%，우우대조조적(60.54±9.41)mmHg、(57.54±9.64)mmHg，림상치료유효솔78.3%。경통계학처리，량조차이존재통계학의의(P＜0.05)。결론：채용규범방안치료노년폐심병합병관심병환자，림상효과현저，치득재각급의원응용、추엄。
Objective:To observe the clinical effect of standard solution in the treatment of elderly patients with pulmonary heart disease combined with coronary heart disease,and discuss the clinical application value of standard solution.Methods: 120 cases of elderly patients with pulmonary heart disease combined with coronary heart disease were admitted.According to random number table method,they were divided into groups.The control group were given oxygen therapy,anti infection,eliminating phlegm and other conventional treatment.The experimental group were given standard solution treatment.Compare the clinical curative effect of elderly patients between two groups.Results:Compared with the control group,the treatment effect of elderly patients with pulmonary heart disease combined with coronary heart disease in the experimental group was better.PaO2,PaCO2, clinical treatment efficiency of the experimental group were 69.47 ± 8.47mmHg,47.52 ± 10.13mmHg,93.3% , and that of the control group were 60.54 ± 9.41mmHg,57.54 ± 9.64mmHg,78.3% .The differences between the two groups had statistical significance(P<0.05).Conclusion:The clinical effect of using standard solution in the treatment of elderly patients with pulmonary heart disease combined with coronary heart disease is significant,so it is worth popularizing and application in hospitals.
