国际医学放射学杂志
國際醫學放射學雜誌
국제의학방사학잡지
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RADIOLOGY
2014年
4期
311-313
,共3页
柳杰%刘佩芳%张连连%邵真真%张洪营
柳傑%劉珮芳%張連連%邵真真%張洪營
류걸%류패방%장련련%소진진%장홍영
数字乳腺X线摄影%平均腺体剂量%腺体密度%压迫厚度
數字乳腺X線攝影%平均腺體劑量%腺體密度%壓迫厚度
수자유선X선섭영%평균선체제량%선체밀도%압박후도
Digital mammography%Average glandular dose%Gland density%Compression thickness
目的:分析数字乳腺X线摄影平均腺体剂量(AGD)与乳腺密度及压迫厚度之间的关系,探讨乳腺密度、压迫厚度对AGD的影响。方法回顾性分析2008年10月在我院就诊的600例女性病人的600幅单侧乳腺头尾位影像资料,均采用自动曝光模式。按照BI-RADS标准将腺体分为<25%、25%~50%、51%~75%和>75%共4型,每型150例,每型按照乳腺压迫厚度又分为<35 mm、35~50 mm 和51~64 mm 组,每组各50例。采用 SPSS 17.0统计学软件对不同压迫厚度、腺体密度的病人的 AGD 进行单因素方差分析,对不同压迫厚度、腺体密度与AGD间的关系采用Spearman相关性分析。结果不同压迫厚度、腺体密度的病人,其AGD的差异均具有统计学意义(P=0.000),且AGD随着乳腺压迫厚度和腺体密度的增加而增加;同时,腺体密度与AGD的相关性(r=0.674, P=0.000)高于压迫厚度(r=0.456,P=0.000)。结论乳腺密度及压迫厚度与数字乳腺X线摄影AGD关系密切,有利于在手动曝光模式或某些特殊情况下根据乳腺类型(腺体密度、厚度等)选择适当的曝光参数,以最低的辐射剂量获得最优质的影像,减少病人的辐射损伤。
目的:分析數字乳腺X線攝影平均腺體劑量(AGD)與乳腺密度及壓迫厚度之間的關繫,探討乳腺密度、壓迫厚度對AGD的影響。方法迴顧性分析2008年10月在我院就診的600例女性病人的600幅單側乳腺頭尾位影像資料,均採用自動曝光模式。按照BI-RADS標準將腺體分為<25%、25%~50%、51%~75%和>75%共4型,每型150例,每型按照乳腺壓迫厚度又分為<35 mm、35~50 mm 和51~64 mm 組,每組各50例。採用 SPSS 17.0統計學軟件對不同壓迫厚度、腺體密度的病人的 AGD 進行單因素方差分析,對不同壓迫厚度、腺體密度與AGD間的關繫採用Spearman相關性分析。結果不同壓迫厚度、腺體密度的病人,其AGD的差異均具有統計學意義(P=0.000),且AGD隨著乳腺壓迫厚度和腺體密度的增加而增加;同時,腺體密度與AGD的相關性(r=0.674, P=0.000)高于壓迫厚度(r=0.456,P=0.000)。結論乳腺密度及壓迫厚度與數字乳腺X線攝影AGD關繫密切,有利于在手動曝光模式或某些特殊情況下根據乳腺類型(腺體密度、厚度等)選擇適噹的曝光參數,以最低的輻射劑量穫得最優質的影像,減少病人的輻射損傷。
목적:분석수자유선X선섭영평균선체제량(AGD)여유선밀도급압박후도지간적관계,탐토유선밀도、압박후도대AGD적영향。방법회고성분석2008년10월재아원취진적600례녀성병인적600폭단측유선두미위영상자료,균채용자동폭광모식。안조BI-RADS표준장선체분위<25%、25%~50%、51%~75%화>75%공4형,매형150례,매형안조유선압박후도우분위<35 mm、35~50 mm 화51~64 mm 조,매조각50례。채용 SPSS 17.0통계학연건대불동압박후도、선체밀도적병인적 AGD 진행단인소방차분석,대불동압박후도、선체밀도여AGD간적관계채용Spearman상관성분석。결과불동압박후도、선체밀도적병인,기AGD적차이균구유통계학의의(P=0.000),차AGD수착유선압박후도화선체밀도적증가이증가;동시,선체밀도여AGD적상관성(r=0.674, P=0.000)고우압박후도(r=0.456,P=0.000)。결론유선밀도급압박후도여수자유선X선섭영AGD관계밀절,유리우재수동폭광모식혹모사특수정황하근거유선류형(선체밀도、후도등)선택괄당적폭광삼수,이최저적복사제량획득최우질적영상,감소병인적복사손상。
Objective To investigate the effect of mammographic density and compression thickness on average glandular dose (AGD). Methods Unilateral breast craniocaudal imaging data and adopt automatic exposure mode from 600 female patients which were collected in October 2008 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. According to the BI-RADS standard, the gland densities were divided into four types, including<25%, 25%~50%, 51%~75%, and>75%, with 150 cases each. Each type was divided into < 35 mm, 35~50 mm, and 51~64 mm, according to the breast compression thickness, 50 cases in each group. SPSS 17.0 was used to test the differences in AGD between types/groups of compression thickness and gland density with single factor analysis of variance. Spearman coefficient was used to test the correlation between different gland density, compression thickness, and AGD. Results AGD values were statistically significant different between types/groups of compression thickness and gland density(P<0.001). The values of AGD were increased when increasing breast compression thickness and glandular density. The gland density had greater influence on AGD (r=0.674, P<0.001) than compression thickness did (r=0.456, P<0.001). Conclusion Breast density and compression thickness have close relationship with the AGD in digital mammography. In manual exposure mode or some special circumstances, exposure parameters should be adjusted based on the breast type (gland density and thickness) to reduce the radiation injury without compromising image quality.