中国康复
中國康複
중국강복
CHINESE JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION
2014年
3期
192-194
,共3页
陈勇%彭轩%汤智伟%陆敏
陳勇%彭軒%湯智偉%陸敏
진용%팽헌%탕지위%륙민
关节松动术%体外冲击波%肩周炎%肩关节疼痛与功能障碍指数
關節鬆動術%體外遲擊波%肩週炎%肩關節疼痛與功能障礙指數
관절송동술%체외충격파%견주염%견관절동통여공능장애지수
mobilization%extracorporeal shock wave%scapulohumeral periarthritis%SPADI
目的:观察关节松动术结合体外冲击波治疗肩周炎的疗效。方法:70例肩周炎患者随机分为观察组和对照组各35例。2组均采用关节松动术治疗,观察组加用体外冲击波治疗。治疗前后采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评定疼痛,并评定肩关节疼痛与功能障碍指数(SPADI)及临床疗效。结果:治疗1及2个疗程后,2组患者VAS评分均较治疗前显著降低,且同时段观察组评分更低于对照组(均 P<0.05)。治疗2个疗程后,2组SPADI亚量表及总评分均较治疗前明显降低(P<0.05),且观察组更低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组有效率明显高于对照组(94.3%、77.1%,P<0.05)。结论:关节松动术结合体外冲击波治疗肩周炎疗效显著,值得临床进一步推广、应用。
目的:觀察關節鬆動術結閤體外遲擊波治療肩週炎的療效。方法:70例肩週炎患者隨機分為觀察組和對照組各35例。2組均採用關節鬆動術治療,觀察組加用體外遲擊波治療。治療前後採用視覺模擬評分法(VAS)評定疼痛,併評定肩關節疼痛與功能障礙指數(SPADI)及臨床療效。結果:治療1及2箇療程後,2組患者VAS評分均較治療前顯著降低,且同時段觀察組評分更低于對照組(均 P<0.05)。治療2箇療程後,2組SPADI亞量錶及總評分均較治療前明顯降低(P<0.05),且觀察組更低于對照組(P<0.05);觀察組有效率明顯高于對照組(94.3%、77.1%,P<0.05)。結論:關節鬆動術結閤體外遲擊波治療肩週炎療效顯著,值得臨床進一步推廣、應用。
목적:관찰관절송동술결합체외충격파치료견주염적료효。방법:70례견주염환자수궤분위관찰조화대조조각35례。2조균채용관절송동술치료,관찰조가용체외충격파치료。치료전후채용시각모의평분법(VAS)평정동통,병평정견관절동통여공능장애지수(SPADI)급림상료효。결과:치료1급2개료정후,2조환자VAS평분균교치료전현저강저,차동시단관찰조평분경저우대조조(균 P<0.05)。치료2개료정후,2조SPADI아량표급총평분균교치료전명현강저(P<0.05),차관찰조경저우대조조(P<0.05);관찰조유효솔명현고우대조조(94.3%、77.1%,P<0.05)。결론:관절송동술결합체외충격파치료견주염료효현저,치득림상진일보추엄、응용。
Objective :To observe the efficacy of mobilization combined with extracorporeal shock wave treatment in patients with scapulohumeral periarthritis .Methods :Seventy patients were divided into observation group and control group randomly(n=35 each) .Both groups received mobilization treatment ,and observation group given extracorpo-real shock wave treatment additionally .Two groups were evaluated by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ,shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) and clinical effects before and after treatment .Results :After one and two courses of treatment ,the VAS scores in both groups were decreased obviously as compared to pretreatment ,more significantly in observation group than in control group(all P<0 .05) .After two courses of treatment ,the SPADI scores in both groups were decreased obviously as compared to pretreatment (P<0 .05) ,more significantly in observation group than in control group(P<0 .05) .The clinical effective rate in observation group was significantly higher than in con-trol group(94 .3% vs .77 .1% ,P<0 .05) .Conclusion :Mobilization combined with extracorporeal shock wave treat-ment can alleviate the pain of patients with scapulohumeral periarthritis ,and the technique was worth expanding .