局解手术学杂志
跼解手術學雜誌
국해수술학잡지
JOURNAL OF REGIONAL ANATOMY AND OPERATIVE SURGERY
2014年
3期
275-276,277
,共3页
刘岗%辛立文%梁源清%唐祖林%唐勇涛
劉崗%辛立文%樑源清%唐祖林%唐勇濤
류강%신립문%량원청%당조림%당용도
腰椎滑脱%植骨融合%治疗效果
腰椎滑脫%植骨融閤%治療效果
요추활탈%식골융합%치료효과
lumbar spondylolisthesis%bone graft fusion%body function
目的:研究不同入路Cage植骨联合椎弓根螺钉内固定融合治疗腰椎滑脱的临床疗效。方法将2011年1月至2012年12月我院收治的120例腰椎滑脱患者按手术方式分为前路椎体间植骨融合术( ALIF)组和后外侧植骨融合术( PLF)组、经后路椎体间植骨融合术(PLIF)组,每组40例,观察手术相关指标及远期机体功能情况。结果 PLIF组患者的手术时间为(82.3±12.1) h,术中出血量为(60.3±9.5) mL,术后下床活动时间为(5.5±0.7) d,NRS评分为(1.5±0.2)分,术后3、6、9、12个月后的ODI评分分别为(24.1±3.4)分、(19.4±3.1)分、(13.5±2.5)分、(9.8±1.6)分,各项指标均明显低于ALIF组和PLF组,PLIF组椎间隙高度(9.3±1.2) mm,明显大于ALIF组和PLF组(P<0.05)。结论经后路椎间植骨融合术能够减小手术创伤,促进术后恢复,改善远期机体功能,在腰椎滑脱的治疗中具有积极价值。
目的:研究不同入路Cage植骨聯閤椎弓根螺釘內固定融閤治療腰椎滑脫的臨床療效。方法將2011年1月至2012年12月我院收治的120例腰椎滑脫患者按手術方式分為前路椎體間植骨融閤術( ALIF)組和後外側植骨融閤術( PLF)組、經後路椎體間植骨融閤術(PLIF)組,每組40例,觀察手術相關指標及遠期機體功能情況。結果 PLIF組患者的手術時間為(82.3±12.1) h,術中齣血量為(60.3±9.5) mL,術後下床活動時間為(5.5±0.7) d,NRS評分為(1.5±0.2)分,術後3、6、9、12箇月後的ODI評分分彆為(24.1±3.4)分、(19.4±3.1)分、(13.5±2.5)分、(9.8±1.6)分,各項指標均明顯低于ALIF組和PLF組,PLIF組椎間隙高度(9.3±1.2) mm,明顯大于ALIF組和PLF組(P<0.05)。結論經後路椎間植骨融閤術能夠減小手術創傷,促進術後恢複,改善遠期機體功能,在腰椎滑脫的治療中具有積極價值。
목적:연구불동입로Cage식골연합추궁근라정내고정융합치료요추활탈적림상료효。방법장2011년1월지2012년12월아원수치적120례요추활탈환자안수술방식분위전로추체간식골융합술( ALIF)조화후외측식골융합술( PLF)조、경후로추체간식골융합술(PLIF)조,매조40례,관찰수술상관지표급원기궤체공능정황。결과 PLIF조환자적수술시간위(82.3±12.1) h,술중출혈량위(60.3±9.5) mL,술후하상활동시간위(5.5±0.7) d,NRS평분위(1.5±0.2)분,술후3、6、9、12개월후적ODI평분분별위(24.1±3.4)분、(19.4±3.1)분、(13.5±2.5)분、(9.8±1.6)분,각항지표균명현저우ALIF조화PLF조,PLIF조추간극고도(9.3±1.2) mm,명현대우ALIF조화PLF조(P<0.05)。결론경후로추간식골융합술능구감소수술창상,촉진술후회복,개선원기궤체공능,재요추활탈적치료중구유적겁개치。
Objective To study the effect of different approaches of Cage bone graft combined with pedicle screw fixation fusion in trea-ting lumbar spondylolisthesis. Methods From January 2011 to December 2012,120 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis in our hospital were randomly divided into anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) group(n=40),postero lateral fusion (PLF) group(n=40) and posteri-or lunbar interbody fusion (PLIF) group(n=40). The related index and body’s function were observed. Results In PLIF group,the opera-tion time was(82. 3 ± 12. 1) h,intraoperative bleeding volume was (60. 3 ± 9. 5) mL,postoperative ambulation time was (5. 5 ± 0. 7) d, NRS score was(1. 5 ± 0. 2),ODI score 3,6,9,12 months after operation were respectively (24. 1 ± 3. 4),(19. 4 ± 3. 1),(13. 5 ± 2. 5), (9. 8 ± 1. 6),which was significantly lower than ALIF group and PLF group;the intervertebral height(9. 3 ± 1. 2)mm were significantly high-er than those of ALIF group and PLF group. Conclusion PLIF has positive clinical value in treating lumbar spondylolisthesis as it can re-duce the operation wound,promote postoperative recovery,and improve the long-term function of body.