临床骨科杂志
臨床骨科雜誌
림상골과잡지
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS
2014年
3期
281-284
,共4页
儿童%肱骨髁上骨折%闭合复位%克氏针%内固定
兒童%肱骨髁上骨摺%閉閤複位%剋氏針%內固定
인동%굉골과상골절%폐합복위%극씨침%내고정
children%humeral supracondylar fracture%closed reduction%Kirschner wire%internal fixation
目的:探讨GartlandⅢ型儿童肱骨髁上骨折的治疗策略。方法将168例获随访GartlandⅢ型肱骨髁上骨折患儿按治疗方式进行分组,闭合复位组13例,闭合复位克氏针内固定组67例,切开复位内固定组88例。对3种治疗方法术后肘关节功能进行评价,观察并发症情况。结果患儿均获得随访,时间6~24个月。参照Flynn评定标准:闭合复位内固定组优于闭合复位组(χ2=5.923,P<0.01);切开复位内固定组优于闭合复位组(χ2=4.262,P<0.01);闭合复位内固定组与切开复位内固定组间差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.354,P>0.05)。结论对于Gartland Ⅲ型儿童肱骨髁上骨折,切开复位克氏针内固定在患儿的预后以及减少并发症方面不存在优势,在保证骨折复位的前提下治疗应首选闭合复位经皮克氏针内固定。
目的:探討GartlandⅢ型兒童肱骨髁上骨摺的治療策略。方法將168例穫隨訪GartlandⅢ型肱骨髁上骨摺患兒按治療方式進行分組,閉閤複位組13例,閉閤複位剋氏針內固定組67例,切開複位內固定組88例。對3種治療方法術後肘關節功能進行評價,觀察併髮癥情況。結果患兒均穫得隨訪,時間6~24箇月。參照Flynn評定標準:閉閤複位內固定組優于閉閤複位組(χ2=5.923,P<0.01);切開複位內固定組優于閉閤複位組(χ2=4.262,P<0.01);閉閤複位內固定組與切開複位內固定組間差異無統計學意義(χ2=0.354,P>0.05)。結論對于Gartland Ⅲ型兒童肱骨髁上骨摺,切開複位剋氏針內固定在患兒的預後以及減少併髮癥方麵不存在優勢,在保證骨摺複位的前提下治療應首選閉閤複位經皮剋氏針內固定。
목적:탐토GartlandⅢ형인동굉골과상골절적치료책략。방법장168례획수방GartlandⅢ형굉골과상골절환인안치료방식진행분조,폐합복위조13례,폐합복위극씨침내고정조67례,절개복위내고정조88례。대3충치료방법술후주관절공능진행평개,관찰병발증정황。결과환인균획득수방,시간6~24개월。삼조Flynn평정표준:폐합복위내고정조우우폐합복위조(χ2=5.923,P<0.01);절개복위내고정조우우폐합복위조(χ2=4.262,P<0.01);폐합복위내고정조여절개복위내고정조간차이무통계학의의(χ2=0.354,P>0.05)。결론대우Gartland Ⅲ형인동굉골과상골절,절개복위극씨침내고정재환인적예후이급감소병발증방면불존재우세,재보증골절복위적전제하치료응수선폐합복위경피극씨침내고정。
Objective To discuss the therapy option and prognosis for GartlandⅢhumeral supracondylar fracture in children.Methods 168 patients of Gartland Ⅲ humeral supracondylar fracture grouped by therapy method closed reduction group(CR),13 cases;closed reduction and internal fixation group(CRI),67 cases;open reduction and internal fixation group (ORI),88 cases;were followed up to compare the difference of the prognosis by reduction and fixation type.Results All cases were followed up for 6 ~24 months.According to Flynn criteria,the prognosis of CRI group was better than CR group(χ2 =5.923,P<0.01)and ORI group was better than CR group(χ2 =4.262,P<0.01),but no difference had been found between CRI and ORI group(χ2 =0.354,P>0.05).Conclusions Closed reduction and internal fixation seems the better choice for the treatment of Gartland Ⅲ fracture,ORI has no advantages on prognosis and complication.