放射学实践
放射學實踐
방사학실천
RADIOLOGIC PRACTICE
2014年
6期
593-596
,共4页
陈刚%吴东%曾蒙苏%张来%顾君英%陆海峰
陳剛%吳東%曾矇囌%張來%顧君英%陸海峰
진강%오동%증몽소%장래%고군영%륙해봉
冠状动脉疾病%体层摄影术,X线计算机%血管造影术%辐射量
冠狀動脈疾病%體層攝影術,X線計算機%血管造影術%輻射量
관상동맥질병%체층섭영술,X선계산궤%혈관조영술%복사량
Coronary artery disease%Tomography,X-ray computed%Angiography%Radiation dosage
目的:探讨使用更窄的曝光时间窗对双源CT冠状动脉成像图像质量和辐射剂量的影响。方法:选择心律稳定、配合屏气在本院行冠状动脉CTA检查者共360例,按心率及扫描方案随机分为5组:当心率<65次/分时,行回顾性心电门控扫描,用70%~80%曝光时间窗成像冠状动脉(A组);窄窗方案根据前瞻性心电门控平扫所获得的最佳时相,选择此时相为中心总长1%作为曝光时间窗,行前瞻心电性门控冠状动脉成像(B组)。当心率≥65次/时,行回顾性心电门控扫描,常规使用30%~80%曝光时间窗成像冠状动脉(C组);窄窗方案根据前瞻性心电门控平扫所获得的最佳时相,以此时相为中心选择总长10%的曝光时间窗,分别用前瞻性心电门控(D 组)和低剂量回顾性心电门控行冠状动脉成像(E组);分别计算各组平均有效辐射剂量以及冠状动脉图像质量(4分制评分),并作统计学分析。结果:A 组[(8.11±1.54)mSv]和B组[(3.63±0.82)mSv],C 组[(10.56±2.51)mSv]和 D 组[(4.42±1.16)mSv],D 组[(4.42±1.16)mSv]和E组[(5.43±1.14)mSv]的辐射剂量相比较均有统计学差异(P<0.05),采用窄窗方案前瞻性心电门控技术的辐射剂量最少;而各组间图像质量,均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论:前瞻性心电门控通过平扫获得最佳时相,当心率<65次/分时,选择曝光总长1%的时间窗,而当心率≥65次/分时,选择曝光总长10%的时间窗,能获得高质量的、满足诊断要求的图像,并可有效地降低辐射量。
目的:探討使用更窄的曝光時間窗對雙源CT冠狀動脈成像圖像質量和輻射劑量的影響。方法:選擇心律穩定、配閤屏氣在本院行冠狀動脈CTA檢查者共360例,按心率及掃描方案隨機分為5組:噹心率<65次/分時,行迴顧性心電門控掃描,用70%~80%曝光時間窗成像冠狀動脈(A組);窄窗方案根據前瞻性心電門控平掃所穫得的最佳時相,選擇此時相為中心總長1%作為曝光時間窗,行前瞻心電性門控冠狀動脈成像(B組)。噹心率≥65次/時,行迴顧性心電門控掃描,常規使用30%~80%曝光時間窗成像冠狀動脈(C組);窄窗方案根據前瞻性心電門控平掃所穫得的最佳時相,以此時相為中心選擇總長10%的曝光時間窗,分彆用前瞻性心電門控(D 組)和低劑量迴顧性心電門控行冠狀動脈成像(E組);分彆計算各組平均有效輻射劑量以及冠狀動脈圖像質量(4分製評分),併作統計學分析。結果:A 組[(8.11±1.54)mSv]和B組[(3.63±0.82)mSv],C 組[(10.56±2.51)mSv]和 D 組[(4.42±1.16)mSv],D 組[(4.42±1.16)mSv]和E組[(5.43±1.14)mSv]的輻射劑量相比較均有統計學差異(P<0.05),採用窄窗方案前瞻性心電門控技術的輻射劑量最少;而各組間圖像質量,均無統計學差異(P>0.05)。結論:前瞻性心電門控通過平掃穫得最佳時相,噹心率<65次/分時,選擇曝光總長1%的時間窗,而噹心率≥65次/分時,選擇曝光總長10%的時間窗,能穫得高質量的、滿足診斷要求的圖像,併可有效地降低輻射量。
목적:탐토사용경착적폭광시간창대쌍원CT관상동맥성상도상질량화복사제량적영향。방법:선택심률은정、배합병기재본원행관상동맥CTA검사자공360례,안심솔급소묘방안수궤분위5조:당심솔<65차/분시,행회고성심전문공소묘,용70%~80%폭광시간창성상관상동맥(A조);착창방안근거전첨성심전문공평소소획득적최가시상,선택차시상위중심총장1%작위폭광시간창,행전첨심전성문공관상동맥성상(B조)。당심솔≥65차/시,행회고성심전문공소묘,상규사용30%~80%폭광시간창성상관상동맥(C조);착창방안근거전첨성심전문공평소소획득적최가시상,이차시상위중심선택총장10%적폭광시간창,분별용전첨성심전문공(D 조)화저제량회고성심전문공행관상동맥성상(E조);분별계산각조평균유효복사제량이급관상동맥도상질량(4분제평분),병작통계학분석。결과:A 조[(8.11±1.54)mSv]화B조[(3.63±0.82)mSv],C 조[(10.56±2.51)mSv]화 D 조[(4.42±1.16)mSv],D 조[(4.42±1.16)mSv]화E조[(5.43±1.14)mSv]적복사제량상비교균유통계학차이(P<0.05),채용착창방안전첨성심전문공기술적복사제량최소;이각조간도상질량,균무통계학차이(P>0.05)。결론:전첨성심전문공통과평소획득최가시상,당심솔<65차/분시,선택폭광총장1%적시간창,이당심솔≥65차/분시,선택폭광총장10%적시간창,능획득고질량적、만족진단요구적도상,병가유효지강저복사량。
Objective:To evaluate the image quality and radiation dose of dual-source CT coronary angiography (CT-CA)with a more narrow exposure window.Methods:In all,360 cases underwent dual-source CTCA and were randomly di-vided into five groups according to the heart rate and scanning protocol.Group A,retrospective ECG-gated scan of the pa-tients with heart rate <65 beats per minute (bpm)was performed from 70% to 80%of the R-R interval to reconstruct cor-onary artery;Group B,prospective ECG-gated scan of the patients with heart rate <65bpm was performed with 1% of the total length of the exposure window;Group C,retrospective ECG-gated scan of the patients with heart rate ≥65bpm was performed from 30% to 80% of the R-R interval to reconstruct coronary artery;Group D,prospective ECG-gated scan of the patients with heart rate ≥65bpm was performed with 10% exposure window;Group E,low dose retrospective ECG-ga-ted scan of the patients with heart rate ≥65bpm was performed.The average effective radiation dose and image quality of coronary arteries (4-point scale)were calculated for each group,and statistical analysis was done.Results:Difference of radi-ation dose between each group was statistically significant (P<0.05).A narrowed scan window on prospective ECG gated dual-source CTCA could reduce the radiation dose;while there was no significant difference in the image quality between the groups (P>0.05).Conclusion:Prospective ECG-gated dual-source CTCA can reduce the radiation dose while maintaining good image quality by selecting 1% of the total length of the exposure window(heart rate <65bpm),and 10% of the total length of the exposure window (heart rate ≥65bpm)after obtaining the optimal interval by plain scan.