中国医学创新
中國醫學創新
중국의학창신
MEDICAL INNOVATION OF CHINA
2014年
17期
24-26
,共3页
姚文艳%董志扬%顾薇%孙菲%高言国
姚文豔%董誌颺%顧薇%孫菲%高言國
요문염%동지양%고미%손비%고언국
重复经颅磁刺激%非痴呆型血管性认知障碍%疗效
重複經顱磁刺激%非癡呆型血管性認知障礙%療效
중복경로자자격%비치태형혈관성인지장애%료효
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation%Vascular cognitive impairment-no dementia%Effect
目的:讨论重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗非痴呆型血管性认知障碍的疗效。方法:收集本院2011年1月-2012年9月的非痴呆型血管性认知障碍的62例患者,并随机分为对照组、rTMS真磁刺激组和rTMS假磁刺激组,进行10 d治疗。应用蒙特利尔认知测评量表(MoCA)和画钟试验(CDT)进行认知功能的评价。结果:药物治疗后各组MoCA、CDT评分较治疗前均有明显升高(P<0.05),治疗后rTMS真刺激组与另两组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),假磁刺激组与对照组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:rTMS对非痴呆型血管性认知障碍患者有治疗作用。
目的:討論重複經顱磁刺激(rTMS)治療非癡呆型血管性認知障礙的療效。方法:收集本院2011年1月-2012年9月的非癡呆型血管性認知障礙的62例患者,併隨機分為對照組、rTMS真磁刺激組和rTMS假磁刺激組,進行10 d治療。應用矇特利爾認知測評量錶(MoCA)和畫鐘試驗(CDT)進行認知功能的評價。結果:藥物治療後各組MoCA、CDT評分較治療前均有明顯升高(P<0.05),治療後rTMS真刺激組與另兩組比較差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05),假磁刺激組與對照組比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論:rTMS對非癡呆型血管性認知障礙患者有治療作用。
목적:토론중복경로자자격(rTMS)치료비치태형혈관성인지장애적료효。방법:수집본원2011년1월-2012년9월적비치태형혈관성인지장애적62례환자,병수궤분위대조조、rTMS진자자격조화rTMS가자자격조,진행10 d치료。응용몽특리이인지측평량표(MoCA)화화종시험(CDT)진행인지공능적평개。결과:약물치료후각조MoCA、CDT평분교치료전균유명현승고(P<0.05),치료후rTMS진자격조여령량조비교차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05),가자자격조여대조조비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론:rTMS대비치태형혈관성인지장애환자유치료작용。
Objective:To investigate the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation(rTMS)on the vascular cognitive impairment-no dementia.Method:62 vascular cognitive impairment-no dementia patients from January 2011 to September 2012 in our hospital were randomly assigned to the real rTMS group,sham rTMS group and control group.Funtion was evaluated by using Montreal cognitive assessmentand(Montreal cognitive assessment,MoCA)and clock drawing test(clock drawing test,CDT)before and after 10-days treatment of the rTMS.Result:For all the patient in the groups the MoCA,CDT showed differences after medical treatment(P<0.05).Compared with the other two groups,the real rTMS group showed better efficacy(P<0.05);there was no difference between sham rTMS group and control group.Conclusion:rTMS has therapeutic effect for the patients of vascular cognitive impairment-no dementia.