世界最新医学信息文摘(电子版)
世界最新醫學信息文摘(電子版)
세계최신의학신식문적(전자판)
World Latest Medicine Information
2014年
18期
18-19,33
,共3页
陈德龙%叶永松%陈小强%李跃%康涛
陳德龍%葉永鬆%陳小彊%李躍%康濤
진덕룡%협영송%진소강%리약%강도
锁定钢板内固定%前侧小切口%肱骨干复杂骨折
鎖定鋼闆內固定%前側小切口%肱骨榦複雜骨摺
쇄정강판내고정%전측소절구%굉골간복잡골절
Locking plate fixation of humeral shaft fracture%Small incision of the side%complex
目的:探讨采用锁定钢板内固定前侧小切口入路治疗肱骨干复杂骨折的临床疗效,为临床上治疗复杂型肱骨骨折提供方法指导。方法将56例肱骨骨干骨折的患者随机分成观察组和对照组各28例,观察组采用锁定钢板内固定方法治疗,对照组采用普通钢板固定治疗方法。比较两组骨折愈合、愈合时间、手术中情况、关节功能恢复评分比较等。结果观察组手术时间(83±12)、住院天数(6±2)、6个月骨折愈合率分别92.86%均高于对照组的手术时间(78±8)、住院天数(5.5±1.5)、骨折愈合率分别85.71%,但是统计比较差异不具有统计学意义(P >0.05);观察组分别为94±6分、88±12分,均高于对照组的90±8分、72±12分,两组统计学比较差异具有统计学意义(P <0.05);,两组并发症率观察组为7.14%,对照组为14.29%,两组并发症率比较差异不具有统计学意义(P >0.05)。结论采用锁定钢板内固定前侧小切口入路治疗肱骨干复杂骨折具有和普通钢板固定治疗方法同样的效果,同时有利于术后肩关节和肘关节的功能恢复。
目的:探討採用鎖定鋼闆內固定前側小切口入路治療肱骨榦複雜骨摺的臨床療效,為臨床上治療複雜型肱骨骨摺提供方法指導。方法將56例肱骨骨榦骨摺的患者隨機分成觀察組和對照組各28例,觀察組採用鎖定鋼闆內固定方法治療,對照組採用普通鋼闆固定治療方法。比較兩組骨摺愈閤、愈閤時間、手術中情況、關節功能恢複評分比較等。結果觀察組手術時間(83±12)、住院天數(6±2)、6箇月骨摺愈閤率分彆92.86%均高于對照組的手術時間(78±8)、住院天數(5.5±1.5)、骨摺愈閤率分彆85.71%,但是統計比較差異不具有統計學意義(P >0.05);觀察組分彆為94±6分、88±12分,均高于對照組的90±8分、72±12分,兩組統計學比較差異具有統計學意義(P <0.05);,兩組併髮癥率觀察組為7.14%,對照組為14.29%,兩組併髮癥率比較差異不具有統計學意義(P >0.05)。結論採用鎖定鋼闆內固定前側小切口入路治療肱骨榦複雜骨摺具有和普通鋼闆固定治療方法同樣的效果,同時有利于術後肩關節和肘關節的功能恢複。
목적:탐토채용쇄정강판내고정전측소절구입로치료굉골간복잡골절적림상료효,위림상상치료복잡형굉골골절제공방법지도。방법장56례굉골골간골절적환자수궤분성관찰조화대조조각28례,관찰조채용쇄정강판내고정방법치료,대조조채용보통강판고정치료방법。비교량조골절유합、유합시간、수술중정황、관절공능회복평분비교등。결과관찰조수술시간(83±12)、주원천수(6±2)、6개월골절유합솔분별92.86%균고우대조조적수술시간(78±8)、주원천수(5.5±1.5)、골절유합솔분별85.71%,단시통계비교차이불구유통계학의의(P >0.05);관찰조분별위94±6분、88±12분,균고우대조조적90±8분、72±12분,량조통계학비교차이구유통계학의의(P <0.05);,량조병발증솔관찰조위7.14%,대조조위14.29%,량조병발증솔비교차이불구유통계학의의(P >0.05)。결론채용쇄정강판내고정전측소절구입로치료굉골간복잡골절구유화보통강판고정치료방법동양적효과,동시유리우술후견관절화주관절적공능회복。
Objective to study the clinical curative effect of locking compression plate internal fixation for complex fractures of anterior incision into collaterals in treatment of humeral shaft, for the clinical treatment of complicatedfracture of humerus provides method guidance.Methods 56 cases of humeral shaft fracture were randomly divided into observation group and control group with 28 cases in each group, the observation group treated with locking plate internal fixation for treatment, control group with the treatment of intramedullary nail. comparison of two groups of fracture healing, healing time, operation conditions, the recovery of joint function score comparison etc.Results The observation group operation time (83 ± 12), (6 ± 2) days of hospitalization, 6 months of operation time of fracture healing rates were 92.86% were higher than those of the control group (78 ± 8), (5.5 ± 1.5) days of hospitalization, the healing rate of fracture were 85.71%, but the statistical difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05); observation group were 94 ± 6, 88 ± 12, were higher than the control group 90 ± 8, 72 ± 12, two group was statistically significant difference (P <0.05); the twogroup, the complication rate was 7.14% in the observation group, the control group was 14.29%, complications rate differences between the two groups no statistically significant (P>0.05).Conclusion the locking plate fixation anterolateral small incision collaterals in treatment of humeral shaft with interlocking intramedullary nail treatment for the same effect complex fractures, and to restore the shoulder andelbow function for postoperative.