安徽史学
安徽史學
안휘사학
HISTORIOGRAPHY ANHUI
2014年
4期
59-68,126
,共11页
太湖流域%浙西%江南
太湖流域%浙西%江南
태호류역%절서%강남
the Taihu Lake Basin%West Zhejiang%Jiangnan
太湖流域是一个地理概念,它是由以太湖为中心的各水系河流湖泊所组成的一个碟形洼地区域。该区域内部社会文化相近,社会经济连成一体,行政沿革上也有着共同的历史渊源,因此在区域研究中往往被视为一个整体对象。但是在江南社会经济史研究领域,学者习惯以“江南”等同于太湖流域的概念,诚不甚允当。作为地理和历史概念的“江南”,自秦汉以来从未真正与太湖流域相重合,与太湖流域等同的“江南”,其实是一个文化心理上的概念,且开始于近代。以“江南”为名开展研究,容易造成研究范围的混乱。相比之下,“浙西”作为历史上存在过的行政概念,区划范围上承东汉吴郡,与太湖流域高度一致,迄明初乃分属直、浙,时逾1200余年,而传统的“浙西”概念在明清时期仍然有其影响力。从“浙西”入手本地区的区域历史研究,更有利于增强学术的严谨性。为使这一观点立足于更为坚实的基础上,有必要对“浙西”的历史作一番详细的梳理。
太湖流域是一箇地理概唸,它是由以太湖為中心的各水繫河流湖泊所組成的一箇碟形窪地區域。該區域內部社會文化相近,社會經濟連成一體,行政沿革上也有著共同的歷史淵源,因此在區域研究中往往被視為一箇整體對象。但是在江南社會經濟史研究領域,學者習慣以“江南”等同于太湖流域的概唸,誠不甚允噹。作為地理和歷史概唸的“江南”,自秦漢以來從未真正與太湖流域相重閤,與太湖流域等同的“江南”,其實是一箇文化心理上的概唸,且開始于近代。以“江南”為名開展研究,容易造成研究範圍的混亂。相比之下,“浙西”作為歷史上存在過的行政概唸,區劃範圍上承東漢吳郡,與太湖流域高度一緻,迄明初迺分屬直、浙,時逾1200餘年,而傳統的“浙西”概唸在明清時期仍然有其影響力。從“浙西”入手本地區的區域歷史研究,更有利于增彊學術的嚴謹性。為使這一觀點立足于更為堅實的基礎上,有必要對“浙西”的歷史作一番詳細的梳理。
태호류역시일개지리개념,타시유이태호위중심적각수계하류호박소조성적일개설형와지구역。해구역내부사회문화상근,사회경제련성일체,행정연혁상야유착공동적역사연원,인차재구역연구중왕왕피시위일개정체대상。단시재강남사회경제사연구영역,학자습관이“강남”등동우태호류역적개념,성불심윤당。작위지리화역사개념적“강남”,자진한이래종미진정여태호류역상중합,여태호류역등동적“강남”,기실시일개문화심리상적개념,차개시우근대。이“강남”위명개전연구,용역조성연구범위적혼란。상비지하,“절서”작위역사상존재과적행정개념,구화범위상승동한오군,여태호류역고도일치,흘명초내분속직、절,시유1200여년,이전통적“절서”개념재명청시기잉연유기영향력。종“절서”입수본지구적구역역사연구,경유리우증강학술적엄근성。위사저일관점립족우경위견실적기출상,유필요대“절서”적역사작일번상세적소리。
The Taihu Lake Basin is a geographical concept;it is a dish-shaped depression consisted of river systems cen-tered on the Taihu Lake.Within this region,there are similar socio-culture,united socio-economy,and a common historical origin both on administration and culture,so historians have tended to see it as an overall regional in their research.But in the research on social and economic history,scholars used to the “Jiangnan”and Taihu Lake Basin as the same concept,which is inappropriate.“Jiangnan”,as a geographical and historical concept,their scopes has never really consistent with the Taihu Lake Basin.The so-called regional of“Jiangnan”,whose consistent with the Taihu Lake Basin is actually a cultural psycho-logical concept from the beginning of modern times.Research under the title of“Jiangnan”is easy to cause confusion among the research objects.By contrast,“West Zhejiang”,as an existed administrative concept in the history,the scope of its area which inherited from the eastern Han dynasty’s Wu Prefecture,was highly consistent with the Taihu Lake Basin,until its divi-sion in the early years of the Ming dynasty.It’s a history of more than one thousand two hundred years,and the traditional“West Zhejiang”concept still had its influence in the Ming and Qing dynasties.The work we have done suggests that conduc-ted regional history research from the perspective of“West Zhejiang”should be more conducive to enhance academic rigor.In order to support this view,it is necessary to clear the history of“West Zhejiang”.