临床误诊误治
臨床誤診誤治
림상오진오치
CLINICAL MISDIAGNOSIS & MISTHERAPY
2014年
7期
84-86
,共3页
徐涛%张云山%李馨%付万袭%薛海萍
徐濤%張雲山%李馨%付萬襲%薛海萍
서도%장운산%리형%부만습%설해평
彩色多普勒超声%血栓%血肿%诊断,鉴别
綵色多普勒超聲%血栓%血腫%診斷,鑒彆
채색다보륵초성%혈전%혈종%진단,감별
Color Doppler ultrasound%Thrombosis%Hematoma%Diagnosis,differential
目的:探讨彩色多普勒超声对小腿肌间静脉丛血栓和肌间血肿的鉴别诊断要点。方法回顾性分析临床确诊的小腿肌间静脉丛血栓54例(血栓组)和小腿肌间血肿24例(血肿组)的二维超声和彩色多普勒血流显像(CDFI)特点,总结超声鉴别诊断要点。结果两组二维超声和 CDFI 影像学表现相似。血栓组36例、血肿组12例均呈实性低回声;血栓组37例、血肿组8例形态均呈窄条形;血栓组30例、血肿组24例局部无血流信号;血栓组40例、血肿组16例压迫试验阳性。血栓组病变均沿血管走行,血肿组病变则多呈局限性;血栓组两端与静脉相连续,血肿组则无此征象,仅10例病变对邻近静脉产生挤压。结论小腿肌间静脉丛血栓和小腿肌间血肿超声声像图容易混淆,需仔细鉴别,CDFI 可作为重要的鉴别诊断手段。
目的:探討綵色多普勒超聲對小腿肌間靜脈叢血栓和肌間血腫的鑒彆診斷要點。方法迴顧性分析臨床確診的小腿肌間靜脈叢血栓54例(血栓組)和小腿肌間血腫24例(血腫組)的二維超聲和綵色多普勒血流顯像(CDFI)特點,總結超聲鑒彆診斷要點。結果兩組二維超聲和 CDFI 影像學錶現相似。血栓組36例、血腫組12例均呈實性低迴聲;血栓組37例、血腫組8例形態均呈窄條形;血栓組30例、血腫組24例跼部無血流信號;血栓組40例、血腫組16例壓迫試驗暘性。血栓組病變均沿血管走行,血腫組病變則多呈跼限性;血栓組兩耑與靜脈相連續,血腫組則無此徵象,僅10例病變對鄰近靜脈產生擠壓。結論小腿肌間靜脈叢血栓和小腿肌間血腫超聲聲像圖容易混淆,需仔細鑒彆,CDFI 可作為重要的鑒彆診斷手段。
목적:탐토채색다보륵초성대소퇴기간정맥총혈전화기간혈종적감별진단요점。방법회고성분석림상학진적소퇴기간정맥총혈전54례(혈전조)화소퇴기간혈종24례(혈종조)적이유초성화채색다보륵혈류현상(CDFI)특점,총결초성감별진단요점。결과량조이유초성화 CDFI 영상학표현상사。혈전조36례、혈종조12례균정실성저회성;혈전조37례、혈종조8례형태균정착조형;혈전조30례、혈종조24례국부무혈류신호;혈전조40례、혈종조16례압박시험양성。혈전조병변균연혈관주행,혈종조병변칙다정국한성;혈전조량단여정맥상련속,혈종조칙무차정상,부10례병변대린근정맥산생제압。결론소퇴기간정맥총혈전화소퇴기간혈종초성성상도용역혼효,수자세감별,CDFI 가작위중요적감별진단수단。
Objective To investigate the key points of color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) in differential diagnosis of calf muscular venous thrombosis and intramuscular hematoma in human legs. Methods The imaging characteristics of two di-mensional ultrasonography and CDFI findings in 54 patients with calf muscular venous thrombosis in leg (thrombosis group) and 24 patients with intramuscular hematoma in legs (hematoma group) were retrospectively analyzed, and key points of ultra-sonic differential diagnosis were summarized. Results The imaging characteristics of the two dimensional ultrasonography and CDFI findings in the two groups were similar. The hypoechoic was found in 36 patients in thrombosis group and 12 patients in hematoma group; strip-shaped echo was found in 37 patients in thrombosis group and 8 patients in hematoma group; no local blood flow signal was found in 30 patients in thrombosis group and 24 patients in hematoma group; positive results of compres-sion test were found in 40 patients in thrombosis group and 16 patients in hematoma group. Thrombosis extended along the blood vessels in thrombosis group, while hematomas in hematomas group was mainly localized; the end of thrombosis connect-ed with veins while hematoma did not show the sign, in which only 10 patients in hematoma group compressed nearby veins. Conclusion Ultrasound imagings of calf muscular venous thrombosis and intramuscular hematoma in legs may be confused, and CDFI can be used as an important method for differential diagnosis.