临床口腔医学杂志
臨床口腔醫學雜誌
림상구강의학잡지
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL STOMATOLOGY
2014年
7期
417-418,419
,共3页
认知行为干预%慢性龈炎%探诊出血百分率
認知行為榦預%慢性齦炎%探診齣血百分率
인지행위간예%만성간염%탐진출혈백분솔
cognitive behavioral intervention%chronic gingivitis%BOPR
目的:评价认知行为干预对慢性龈炎的治疗效果。方法:采用随机分组法将100名慢性龈炎患者分为实验组和对照组。实验组在牙周基础治疗中除给予常规的口腔卫生指导外,再给予认知行为干预措施;对照组在牙周基础治疗中只给予口腔卫生指导,不给予认知行为干预措施。分别于干预后第1、6、12月通过探诊出血百分率来评价认知行为干预效果。应用SPSS 17.0软件对实验数据进行统计学分析。结果:干预后1个月复诊,实验组和对照组探诊出血百分率均较干预前降低(P<0.05),两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);在干预后第6、12月,实验组与对照组相比探诊出血百分率差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:认知行为干预措施可以有效地控制探诊出血,从而达到防治慢性龈炎的效果。
目的:評價認知行為榦預對慢性齦炎的治療效果。方法:採用隨機分組法將100名慢性齦炎患者分為實驗組和對照組。實驗組在牙週基礎治療中除給予常規的口腔衛生指導外,再給予認知行為榦預措施;對照組在牙週基礎治療中隻給予口腔衛生指導,不給予認知行為榦預措施。分彆于榦預後第1、6、12月通過探診齣血百分率來評價認知行為榦預效果。應用SPSS 17.0軟件對實驗數據進行統計學分析。結果:榦預後1箇月複診,實驗組和對照組探診齣血百分率均較榦預前降低(P<0.05),兩組比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);在榦預後第6、12月,實驗組與對照組相比探診齣血百分率差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論:認知行為榦預措施可以有效地控製探診齣血,從而達到防治慢性齦炎的效果。
목적:평개인지행위간예대만성간염적치료효과。방법:채용수궤분조법장100명만성간염환자분위실험조화대조조。실험조재아주기출치료중제급여상규적구강위생지도외,재급여인지행위간예조시;대조조재아주기출치료중지급여구강위생지도,불급여인지행위간예조시。분별우간예후제1、6、12월통과탐진출혈백분솔래평개인지행위간예효과。응용SPSS 17.0연건대실험수거진행통계학분석。결과:간예후1개월복진,실험조화대조조탐진출혈백분솔균교간예전강저(P<0.05),량조비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);재간예후제6、12월,실험조여대조조상비탐진출혈백분솔차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론:인지행위간예조시가이유효지공제탐진출혈,종이체도방치만성간염적효과。
Objective:To investigate the effect of cognitive behavioral intervention on chronic gingivitis. Method:Totally 100 patients with chronic gingivitis were randomly divided into two groups. The experimental group received cogni-tive behavioral intervention besides regular oral hygiene instructions,while the control group received only regular oral hy-giene instructions in initial periodontal treatment. Bleeding on probing rate(BOPR) was used to evaluate the effect of cogni-tive behavioral intervention at 1,6,12 months. SPSS 17.0 software package was employed to analyze experimental data sta-tistically. Result:After 1 month,the BOPR of experimental and control group was decreased when compared with that before cognitive behavioral intervention(P<0.05),there was no statistically difference between experimental and control group after cognitive behavioral intervention (P >0.05). There was statistically difference between control and experimental group at 6,12 months after cognitive behavioral intervention (P <0.05). Conclusion:It was suggested cognitive behavioral interven-tion could control BOP effectively, thus prevent and treat chronic gingivitis.