南方医科大学学报
南方醫科大學學報
남방의과대학학보
JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY
2014年
7期
1057-1060
,共4页
陈敬华%申维玺%夏俊贤%许瑞莲%朱美琴%徐敏
陳敬華%申維璽%夏俊賢%許瑞蓮%硃美琴%徐敏
진경화%신유새%하준현%허서련%주미금%서민
晚期胃癌%替吉奥%维持化疗
晚期胃癌%替吉奧%維持化療
만기위암%체길오%유지화료
advanced gastric cancer%S-1%maintenance chemotherapy
目的:探讨晚期胃癌DCF方案一线化疗后继续替吉奥维持化疗疗效及不良反应。方法随机将60例既往DCF方案一线化疗4~6周期后疗效评价为无疾病进展的晚期胃癌患者分为维持组与对照组。维持组予替吉奥维持化疗(40 mg/m2,连续14 d,每21 d为一个周期),持续至疾病进展或者出现不能耐受毒性为止。对照组予最佳支持治疗。结果维持组的近期有效率(CR+PR)为33.3%,疾病控制率(CR+PR+SD)为73.3%,对照组的近期有效率为3.33%,疾病控制率为46.7%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。维持组的中位疾病进展时间7.9月,较对照组6.8月延长(P<0.05)。两组中位生存期分别为13.8月和11.7月(P>0.05)。维持组主要毒副反应为恶心、呕吐、白细胞减少、手足综合征,无治疗相关死亡。结论 DCF方案一线治疗后继续替吉奥维持治疗晚期胃癌患者,提高近期有效率及疾病控制率,延缓疾病进展,不良反应可以耐受,值得临床进一步研究应用。
目的:探討晚期胃癌DCF方案一線化療後繼續替吉奧維持化療療效及不良反應。方法隨機將60例既往DCF方案一線化療4~6週期後療效評價為無疾病進展的晚期胃癌患者分為維持組與對照組。維持組予替吉奧維持化療(40 mg/m2,連續14 d,每21 d為一箇週期),持續至疾病進展或者齣現不能耐受毒性為止。對照組予最佳支持治療。結果維持組的近期有效率(CR+PR)為33.3%,疾病控製率(CR+PR+SD)為73.3%,對照組的近期有效率為3.33%,疾病控製率為46.7%,兩組比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。維持組的中位疾病進展時間7.9月,較對照組6.8月延長(P<0.05)。兩組中位生存期分彆為13.8月和11.7月(P>0.05)。維持組主要毒副反應為噁心、嘔吐、白細胞減少、手足綜閤徵,無治療相關死亡。結論 DCF方案一線治療後繼續替吉奧維持治療晚期胃癌患者,提高近期有效率及疾病控製率,延緩疾病進展,不良反應可以耐受,值得臨床進一步研究應用。
목적:탐토만기위암DCF방안일선화료후계속체길오유지화료료효급불량반응。방법수궤장60례기왕DCF방안일선화료4~6주기후료효평개위무질병진전적만기위암환자분위유지조여대조조。유지조여체길오유지화료(40 mg/m2,련속14 d,매21 d위일개주기),지속지질병진전혹자출현불능내수독성위지。대조조여최가지지치료。결과유지조적근기유효솔(CR+PR)위33.3%,질병공제솔(CR+PR+SD)위73.3%,대조조적근기유효솔위3.33%,질병공제솔위46.7%,량조비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。유지조적중위질병진전시간7.9월,교대조조6.8월연장(P<0.05)。량조중위생존기분별위13.8월화11.7월(P>0.05)。유지조주요독부반응위악심、구토、백세포감소、수족종합정,무치료상관사망。결론 DCF방안일선치료후계속체길오유지치료만기위암환자,제고근기유효솔급질병공제솔,연완질병진전,불량반응가이내수,치득림상진일보연구응용。
Objective To investigate the efficacy and adverse effect of DCF regimen with subsequent S-1 maintenance chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Methods Sixty AGC patients without disease progression after 4 to 6 cycles of DCF regimen as the first-line chemotherapy were randomized into maintenance group and control group (30 patients each). The patients in the maintenance group received maintenance chemotherapy with S-1 (40 mg/m2, twice daily for 14 days; 21 days for a treatment cycle) until disease progression or with intolerant toxicity, and those in the control group received optimal supportive care. Results The response rate (CR+PR) was 33.3%in the maintenance group, significantly higher than that in the control group (3.33%, P<0.05), and the disease control rate (CR+PR+SD) also differed significantly between the two groups (73.3% vs 46.7%, P<0.05). The median time to progression was 7.9 months in the maintenance group and 6.8 months in the control group, with median overall survival time of 13.8 and 11.7 months, respectively (P>0.05). The most common adverse effect in the maintenance group included nausea, vomiting, leucocytopenia, and hand-foot syndrome; no death occurred in relation to the therapy. Conclusions S-1 maintenance chemotherapy, with a tolerable toxicity profile, can improve the RR, DCR and median time to progression in AGC patients who respond to DCF regimen, but its efficacy still awaits further evaluation.