中国民康医学
中國民康醫學
중국민강의학
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF CHINSEE PEOPLE HEALTH
2014年
12期
39-40,84
,共3页
电针治疗%幻听%治愈率
電針治療%幻聽%治愈率
전침치료%환은%치유솔
Electroacupuncture treatment%Auditory hallucinations%Cure rate
目的：观察电针合并药物治疗幻听的临床疗效。方法：62例存在幻听的精神分裂症患者按随机数字表法分为研究组(31例)和对照组(31例),两组患者均依照医嘱服用药物治疗及进行心理健康教育,其中研究组患者给予4周的电针治疗。采用简明精神病量表(BPRS)对两组患者进行“基线”评分、4周干预后评分的比较。结果：研究组患者有效样本31例,对照组患者有效样本31例。①两组患者4周干预后与“基线”评分的差值比较：研究组患者的 BPRS 总分及幻觉分差值均高于对照组,P 均<0.05。②两组患者临床疗效比较：研究组患者治愈25例(80.64%),有效28例(90.32%)；对照组患者治愈17例(54.84%),有效21例(67.74%)。研究组与对照组患者在治愈率上比较差异有统计学意义(x2=4.724,P<0.05),在有效率上比较差异有统计学意义(x2=4.769,P<0.05)。结论：电针治疗结合药物治疗及心理健康教育,能有效改善患者的幻听症状,提高幻听的治愈率。
目的：觀察電針閤併藥物治療幻聽的臨床療效。方法：62例存在幻聽的精神分裂癥患者按隨機數字錶法分為研究組(31例)和對照組(31例),兩組患者均依照醫囑服用藥物治療及進行心理健康教育,其中研究組患者給予4週的電針治療。採用簡明精神病量錶(BPRS)對兩組患者進行“基線”評分、4週榦預後評分的比較。結果：研究組患者有效樣本31例,對照組患者有效樣本31例。①兩組患者4週榦預後與“基線”評分的差值比較：研究組患者的 BPRS 總分及幻覺分差值均高于對照組,P 均<0.05。②兩組患者臨床療效比較：研究組患者治愈25例(80.64%),有效28例(90.32%)；對照組患者治愈17例(54.84%),有效21例(67.74%)。研究組與對照組患者在治愈率上比較差異有統計學意義(x2=4.724,P<0.05),在有效率上比較差異有統計學意義(x2=4.769,P<0.05)。結論：電針治療結閤藥物治療及心理健康教育,能有效改善患者的幻聽癥狀,提高幻聽的治愈率。
목적：관찰전침합병약물치료환은적림상료효。방법：62례존재환은적정신분렬증환자안수궤수자표법분위연구조(31례)화대조조(31례),량조환자균의조의촉복용약물치료급진행심리건강교육,기중연구조환자급여4주적전침치료。채용간명정신병량표(BPRS)대량조환자진행“기선”평분、4주간예후평분적비교。결과：연구조환자유효양본31례,대조조환자유효양본31례。①량조환자4주간예후여“기선”평분적차치비교：연구조환자적 BPRS 총분급환각분차치균고우대조조,P 균<0.05。②량조환자림상료효비교：연구조환자치유25례(80.64%),유효28례(90.32%)；대조조환자치유17례(54.84%),유효21례(67.74%)。연구조여대조조환자재치유솔상비교차이유통계학의의(x2=4.724,P<0.05),재유효솔상비교차이유통계학의의(x2=4.769,P<0.05)。결론：전침치료결합약물치료급심리건강교육,능유효개선환자적환은증상,제고환은적치유솔。
Objective:To observe the clinical efficacy of electroacupuncture combined with drug treatment for auditory halluci-nations. Methods:62 schizophrenic patients combined with auditory hallucinations were randomly divided into study group (31 cases) and control group (31 cases). All the patients were taking medicine and receiving mental health education following the doctor's ad-vice; besides, research group was given the electroacupuncture treatment for 4 weeks. The two groups were assessed with brief psychi-atric rating scale (BPRS) at baseline and 4 weeks after the intervention and compared. Results: There were 31 valid samples in study group and 31 valid samples in control group. (1) 4 weeks after the intervention, compared with those at baseline, the BPRS total score and illusion difference of study group were higher than those of control group (both P<0. 05). (2) In study group, 25 cases (80. 64% ) were cured and 28 cases (90. 32% ) were effective; while in control group, 17 cases (54. 84% ) were cured and 21 cases (67. 74% ) were effective; therefore, the difference in the cure rate was statistically significant (x2 =4. 724, P<0. 05), and the difference in the effective rate was also statistically significant (x2 = 4. 769, P <0. 05 ). Conclusions: Electroacupuncture combined with drug treatment and mental health education can effectively improve the patient's auditory hallucinations and improve the cure rate of auditory hallucinations.
