中国医药导报
中國醫藥導報
중국의약도보
CHINA MEDICAL HERALD
2014年
19期
127-130
,共4页
李冬莉%孔静%王永红%姚志翠%纪敬敏
李鼕莉%孔靜%王永紅%姚誌翠%紀敬敏
리동리%공정%왕영홍%요지취%기경민
评判性思维%Taba教学法%反思日记法%护理本科生%护理技能训练
評判性思維%Taba教學法%反思日記法%護理本科生%護理技能訓練
평판성사유%Taba교학법%반사일기법%호리본과생%호리기능훈련
Critical thinking%Taba teaching%Diary reflection%Nursing undergraduates%Nursing skills training
目的:探讨评判性思维教学法在护理本科生护理技能训练中的作用。方法将河北中医学院2010级护理本科生118名分为两组,在实习前1个月开设护理技能训练课程,实验组(60名)运用Taba教学法和反思日记法,对照组(58名)则采用传统的教学方法,技能训练结束后,比较两组学生的评判性思维能力和技能训练成绩。结果实验组护生护理技能训练[(92.21±4.27)分]以及评判性思维的寻求真相[(39.88±2.76)分]、分析能力[(44.30±2.28)分]、自信心[(43.32±6.18)分]、求知欲[(46.47±4.01)分]、总分[(298.03±10.52)分]与对照组[护生护理技能训练平均(90.11±5.21)分以及评判性思维的寻求真相(38.07±3.23)分、分析能力(42.79±2.61)分、自信心(39.91±2.42)分、求知欲(44.83±4.57)分、总分(288.02±10.59)分]比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论评判性思维教学法有助于提高护理本科生护理技能训练效果。
目的:探討評判性思維教學法在護理本科生護理技能訓練中的作用。方法將河北中醫學院2010級護理本科生118名分為兩組,在實習前1箇月開設護理技能訓練課程,實驗組(60名)運用Taba教學法和反思日記法,對照組(58名)則採用傳統的教學方法,技能訓練結束後,比較兩組學生的評判性思維能力和技能訓練成績。結果實驗組護生護理技能訓練[(92.21±4.27)分]以及評判性思維的尋求真相[(39.88±2.76)分]、分析能力[(44.30±2.28)分]、自信心[(43.32±6.18)分]、求知欲[(46.47±4.01)分]、總分[(298.03±10.52)分]與對照組[護生護理技能訓練平均(90.11±5.21)分以及評判性思維的尋求真相(38.07±3.23)分、分析能力(42.79±2.61)分、自信心(39.91±2.42)分、求知欲(44.83±4.57)分、總分(288.02±10.59)分]比較,差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論評判性思維教學法有助于提高護理本科生護理技能訓練效果。
목적:탐토평판성사유교학법재호리본과생호리기능훈련중적작용。방법장하북중의학원2010급호리본과생118명분위량조,재실습전1개월개설호리기능훈련과정,실험조(60명)운용Taba교학법화반사일기법,대조조(58명)칙채용전통적교학방법,기능훈련결속후,비교량조학생적평판성사유능력화기능훈련성적。결과실험조호생호리기능훈련[(92.21±4.27)분]이급평판성사유적심구진상[(39.88±2.76)분]、분석능력[(44.30±2.28)분]、자신심[(43.32±6.18)분]、구지욕[(46.47±4.01)분]、총분[(298.03±10.52)분]여대조조[호생호리기능훈련평균(90.11±5.21)분이급평판성사유적심구진상(38.07±3.23)분、분석능력(42.79±2.61)분、자신심(39.91±2.42)분、구지욕(44.83±4.57)분、총분(288.02±10.59)분]비교,차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론평판성사유교학법유조우제고호리본과생호리기능훈련효과。
Objective To expound the effect of critical thinking teaching on nursing skills training in nursing under-graduates. Methods Nursing skills training course was provided for undergraduate nursing students, one month before their internship. 2010 nursing students were divided into control group (58 students) and experiment group (60 students). The method of Taba teaching and diary reflection were used in experiment group, while traditional method was used in control group. The students' ability of critical thinking and nursing skills training result were compared between the two groups after the training. Results The average scores of nursing skills training [(92.21±4.27) scores], truth-seeking [(39.88±2.76) scores], analyticity [(44.30±2.28) scores], confidence [(43.32±6.18) scores], thirst for knowledge [(46.47±4.01) scores] and total scores [(298.03±10.52) scores] of critical thinking in the experiment group were significantly higher than those in the control group [(90.11±5.21), (38.07±3.23), (42.79±2.61), (39.91±2.42), (44.83±4.57), (288.02±10.59) scores], the differences were statistically significant (P< 0.05). Conclusion Critical thinking teaching method can enhance the effect of nursing skills training in nursing undergraduates.