CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨微创接骨板技术治疗四肢骨折的临床疗效。方法选取我院收治的130例四肢骨折患者，随机分为对照组和实验组2组，对照组采用传统内固定术进行治疗，实验组采用微创接骨板治疗，比较2组患者的临床疗效。结果对照组优良率为70.77%，实验组优良率为92.31%，两组数据比较，差异较大，具有统计学意义（P＜0.05），实验组患者术中平均出血量、手术时间、锻炼时间及住院时间均短于对照组患者，两两数据比较，差异均具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论微创接骨板技术治疗四肢骨折的临床疗效较好，功能恢复率良好，值得临床进一步推广应用。
목적：탐토미창접골판기술치료사지골절적림상료효。방법선취아원수치적130례사지골절환자，수궤분위대조조화실험조2조，대조조채용전통내고정술진행치료，실험조채용미창접골판치료，비교2조환자적림상료효。결과대조조우량솔위70.77%，실험조우량솔위92.31%，량조수거비교，차이교대，구유통계학의의（P＜0.05），실험조환자술중평균출혈량、수술시간、단련시간급주원시간균단우대조조환자，량량수거비교，차이균구유통계학의의（P＜0.05）。결론미창접골판기술치료사지골절적림상료효교호，공능회복솔량호，치득림상진일보추엄응용。
Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in treatment of limbfracture patients. Methods 130 cases of limbs fracture patients in our hospital were randomly divided into two groups, the control group treated with the traditional internal fixation and the experimental group with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis. Compare the clinical efficacy of 2 groups of patients. Results The excellent rate of control group and experimental group were 70.77%and 92.31%, which was significantly different (P<0.05). The index of experimental group was significantly better than the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion If minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis should be adopted as the treatment of limb fracture, there would be better surgical effect and higher functional recovery rate and clinical value.