CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨中心静脉导管行胸腔闭式引流治疗80例气胸。方法资料选自2010年4月-2013年4月在该院就诊的气胸患者160例，分为两组，每组80例，对照组给予传统胸腔的穿刺术治疗，研究组给予中心静脉导管的胸腔闭式引流治疗，对两组的临床治疗效果、各项指标情况、并发症发生情况进行分析。结果研究组与对照组在总有效率，总引流量，积液吸收的时间并发症发生率之间的差异有统计学意义。结论在气胸的治疗中中心静脉导管的胸腔闭式引流治疗较传统胸腔的穿刺术治疗具有更佳的临床治疗效果，值得临床广泛推广与使用。
목적：탐토중심정맥도관행흉강폐식인류치료80례기흉。방법자료선자2010년4월-2013년4월재해원취진적기흉환자160례，분위량조，매조80례，대조조급여전통흉강적천자술치료，연구조급여중심정맥도관적흉강폐식인류치료，대량조적림상치료효과、각항지표정황、병발증발생정황진행분석。결과연구조여대조조재총유효솔，총인류량，적액흡수적시간병발증발생솔지간적차이유통계학의의。결론재기흉적치료중중심정맥도관적흉강폐식인류치료교전통흉강적천자술치료구유경가적림상치료효과，치득림상엄범추엄여사용。
Objective To study the central venous catheter closed drainage of thoracic cavity in the treatment of 80 cases of pneumothorax. Methods The data of 160 cases with pneumothorax admitted in our hospital from April 2010 to April 2013 were di-vided into two groups with 80 cases in each. The control group was given traditional thoracic puncture treatment, while the study group was given central venous catheter closed drainage of thoracic cavity. The clinical therapeutic effect, the indicators, the inci-dence of complications of the two groups were analyzed. Results The differences in total effective rate, total volume of drainage, fluid absorption time, and the incidence of complications between the study group and the control group were statistically signifi-cant. Conclusion For the treatment of pneumothorax, central venous catheter closed drainage of thoracic cavity has a better effect than that of the traditional thoracic puncture treatment, and it is worthy of widely clinical promotion and application.