中国医药指南
中國醫藥指南
중국의약지남
CHINA MEDICINE GUIDE
2014年
16期
54-55
,共2页
综合护理干预%促进%骨折患者%康复%观察
綜閤護理榦預%促進%骨摺患者%康複%觀察
종합호리간예%촉진%골절환자%강복%관찰
Comprehensive nursing intervention%Promotion%Fractures%Rehabilitation%Observation
目的:观察综合护理干预对于促进骨折病患术后康复中应用的效果。方法从2011年3月至2013年6月,选择于我院治疗骨折病患100例作为研究对象,以数字法随机分为观察组(50例)以及对照组(50例)。对对照组行常规护理,对观察组行综合护理干预。对比观察两组病患康复情况。结果观察组病患对护理方案满意者占比70.00%(35/50),显著高于对照组的50.00%(25/50)。对护理方案不满意者占比4.00%(2/50),显著低于对照组的22.00%(11/50)。差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。观察组疗效为优者占比72.00%(36/50),优良率为98.00%(49/50),均显著高于对照组的48.00%(24/50),86.00%(43/50)。差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论综合护理干预应用于骨折病患康复治疗中,有效缓解病患痛苦,效果较好。且安全性较高,值得临床推荐。
目的:觀察綜閤護理榦預對于促進骨摺病患術後康複中應用的效果。方法從2011年3月至2013年6月,選擇于我院治療骨摺病患100例作為研究對象,以數字法隨機分為觀察組(50例)以及對照組(50例)。對對照組行常規護理,對觀察組行綜閤護理榦預。對比觀察兩組病患康複情況。結果觀察組病患對護理方案滿意者佔比70.00%(35/50),顯著高于對照組的50.00%(25/50)。對護理方案不滿意者佔比4.00%(2/50),顯著低于對照組的22.00%(11/50)。差異均有統計學意義(均P<0.05)。觀察組療效為優者佔比72.00%(36/50),優良率為98.00%(49/50),均顯著高于對照組的48.00%(24/50),86.00%(43/50)。差異均有統計學意義(均P<0.05)。結論綜閤護理榦預應用于骨摺病患康複治療中,有效緩解病患痛苦,效果較好。且安全性較高,值得臨床推薦。
목적:관찰종합호리간예대우촉진골절병환술후강복중응용적효과。방법종2011년3월지2013년6월,선택우아원치료골절병환100례작위연구대상,이수자법수궤분위관찰조(50례)이급대조조(50례)。대대조조행상규호리,대관찰조행종합호리간예。대비관찰량조병환강복정황。결과관찰조병환대호리방안만의자점비70.00%(35/50),현저고우대조조적50.00%(25/50)。대호리방안불만의자점비4.00%(2/50),현저저우대조조적22.00%(11/50)。차이균유통계학의의(균P<0.05)。관찰조료효위우자점비72.00%(36/50),우량솔위98.00%(49/50),균현저고우대조조적48.00%(24/50),86.00%(43/50)。차이균유통계학의의(균P<0.05)。결론종합호리간예응용우골절병환강복치료중,유효완해병환통고,효과교호。차안전성교고,치득림상추천。
Objective To investigate the application of comprehensive nursing intervention to promote rehabilitation patients in the postoperative effect of fracture. Methods From 2011 March to 2013 June in our hospital, select the patients with fracture of 100 cases as the research object, the numbers were randomly divided into the observation group(50 cases)and control group(50 cases). The control group received conventional the nursing, the observation group underwent comprehensive nursing intervention. The two groups were compared in patient rehabilitation. Results The patients in the observation group were satisfied for nursing programs accounted for 70%(35/50), significantly higher than the control group of 50%(25/50). Not satisfied with the nursing programme accounted for 4%(2/50), significantly lower than the control group 22%(11/50). The differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The curative effect of therapeutic group was excellent accounted for more than 72%(36/50), the excellent and good rate was 98%(49/50), were significantly higher than those in control group 48%(24/50), 86%(43/50). The differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion The application of comprehensive nursing intervention on the fracture patients in rehabilitation, effectively alleviate the patients' pain, better. And higher security, worthy of recommendation.