中国当代医药
中國噹代醫藥
중국당대의약
PERSON
2014年
16期
40-41,44
,共3页
腹腔镜胆囊切除术%开腹胆囊切除术%并发症%临床疗效
腹腔鏡膽囊切除術%開腹膽囊切除術%併髮癥%臨床療效
복강경담낭절제술%개복담낭절제술%병발증%림상료효
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy%Open cholecystectomy%Complication%Clinical efficacy
目的:评价腹腔镜胆囊切除术和开腹胆囊切除术的临床效果及术后并发症发生情况。方法选取2010年5月~2013年4月在本院行胆囊切除术的患者110例,随机分为观察组和对照组,观察组55例,采用腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗,对照组55例,采用开腹胆囊切除术治疗,观察并比较两组的并发症发生率及临床疗效。结果观察组的并发症发生率为9.09%,低于对照组的25.45%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组的手术时间、排气时间、下床活动时间及住院时间短于对照组,术中出血量少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论与传统开腹手术相比,腹腔镜胆囊切除术具有手术时间短、创伤小、术中出血量少、患者恢复快及并发症发生率低等优点,可作为胆囊切除术的首选方式。
目的:評價腹腔鏡膽囊切除術和開腹膽囊切除術的臨床效果及術後併髮癥髮生情況。方法選取2010年5月~2013年4月在本院行膽囊切除術的患者110例,隨機分為觀察組和對照組,觀察組55例,採用腹腔鏡膽囊切除術治療,對照組55例,採用開腹膽囊切除術治療,觀察併比較兩組的併髮癥髮生率及臨床療效。結果觀察組的併髮癥髮生率為9.09%,低于對照組的25.45%,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。觀察組的手術時間、排氣時間、下床活動時間及住院時間短于對照組,術中齣血量少于對照組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論與傳統開腹手術相比,腹腔鏡膽囊切除術具有手術時間短、創傷小、術中齣血量少、患者恢複快及併髮癥髮生率低等優點,可作為膽囊切除術的首選方式。
목적:평개복강경담낭절제술화개복담낭절제술적림상효과급술후병발증발생정황。방법선취2010년5월~2013년4월재본원행담낭절제술적환자110례,수궤분위관찰조화대조조,관찰조55례,채용복강경담낭절제술치료,대조조55례,채용개복담낭절제술치료,관찰병비교량조적병발증발생솔급림상료효。결과관찰조적병발증발생솔위9.09%,저우대조조적25.45%,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。관찰조적수술시간、배기시간、하상활동시간급주원시간단우대조조,술중출혈량소우대조조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론여전통개복수술상비,복강경담낭절제술구유수술시간단、창상소、술중출혈량소、환자회복쾌급병발증발생솔저등우점,가작위담낭절제술적수선방식。
Objective To evaluate clinical effect and the incidence of postoperative complication of laparoscopic chole-cystectomy and open cholecystectomy. Methods 110 cases of patients with cholecystectomy from May 2010 to April 2013 in our hospital were selected and randomly divided into observation group and control group,laparoscopic chole-cystectomy treatment was used in observation group(55 cases),open cholecystectomy treatment was used in control group (55 cases).The incidence rate of complication and clinical efficacy in two groups was compared respectively. Results The incidence rate of complication in observation group was 9.09%,lower than that in control group (25.45%),with sta-tistical difference (P<0.05).Operative time,discharge time,ambulation time and hospital stay time in observation group was shorter than that in control group respectively,blood loss in observation group was less than that in control group, with statistical difference (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with traditional open surgery,laparoscopic cholecystectomy has shorter operation time,small trauma,less intraoperative blood loss,faster recovery and low complication rate,should be the preferred way of cholecystectomy.