CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨分析时间分辨荧光免疫技术（TRFIA）法定量检测HBsAb的临床价值。方法选取我院2007年3月至2009年3月99例乙肝两对半的临床标本，分为观察组（TRFIA法）和对照组（ELASA法），对比两组检测结果，进行统计学分析。结果两组检测结果对比无明显差异（P＞0.05），无统计学意义；两组检测结果的模式对比，少见及罕见的模式一致相符率明显低于其他常见模式（P＜0.05），具有统计学意义。结论时间分辨荧光免疫技术（TRFIA）法定量检测HBsAb的敏感性比酶联免疫吸附实验（ELASA）法要高，能进行HBV血清标志的特异性检测，准确率高，具有重要的临床诊断价值。
목적：탐토분석시간분변형광면역기술（TRFIA）법정량검측HBsAb적림상개치。방법선취아원2007년3월지2009년3월99례을간량대반적림상표본，분위관찰조（TRFIA법）화대조조（ELASA법），대비량조검측결과，진행통계학분석。결과량조검측결과대비무명현차이（P＞0.05），무통계학의의；량조검측결과적모식대비，소견급한견적모식일치상부솔명현저우기타상견모식（P＜0.05），구유통계학의의。결론시간분변형광면역기술（TRFIA）법정량검측HBsAb적민감성비매련면역흡부실험（ELASA）법요고，능진행HBV혈청표지적특이성검측，준학솔고，구유중요적림상진단개치。
ObjectiveTo investigate the analysis of TRFIA Quantitative detection of HBsAb clinical value.MethodsSelect the hospital from March 2007 to March 2009 99 cases, it divided into two groups(TRFIA method)and the control group (ELASA method), compared two groups of test results, statistical analysis.ResultsTest results comparing the two groups no signiifcant difference(P>0.05), not statistically signiifcant; two sets of test results of model comparison, the same pattern of rare and unusual line was significantly lower than other common mode(P<0.05), statistically significance. ConclusionTRFIA Quantitative detection of HBsAb sensitive than ELASA method must be high, capable of speciifc detection of HBV serum markers, with high accuracy, has important diagnostic value.