中国当代医药
中國噹代醫藥
중국당대의약
PERSON
2014年
17期
114-115,118
,共3页
心理干预%心绞痛型冠心病%整体疗效
心理榦預%心絞痛型冠心病%整體療效
심리간예%심교통형관심병%정체료효
Psychological intervention%Coronary heart disease with angina pectoris%Overall efficacy
目的：探讨分析心理干预对心绞痛型冠心病患者的影响。方法抽取本院2013年5月收治的100例心绞痛型冠心病患者，随机分为干预组和对照组，每组各50例。对照组进行心脏病的相关基础治疗，干预组在对照组基础上同时进行心理干预。比较两组的临床疗效及SDS、SAS评分。结果临床症状改善院干预组的总有效率为96%，高于对照组的74%(P<0.05)；心电图检测结果院干预组的总有效率为90%，高于对照组的74%(P<0.05)；两组干预前后的SDS、SAS评分差异有统计学意义，两组干预后的SDS、SAS评分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对伴发的抑郁、焦虑的心绞痛型冠心病患者进行相关心理干预，在改善抑郁、焦虑的同时，可明显提高对心血管疾病的整体疗效。
目的：探討分析心理榦預對心絞痛型冠心病患者的影響。方法抽取本院2013年5月收治的100例心絞痛型冠心病患者，隨機分為榦預組和對照組，每組各50例。對照組進行心髒病的相關基礎治療，榦預組在對照組基礎上同時進行心理榦預。比較兩組的臨床療效及SDS、SAS評分。結果臨床癥狀改善院榦預組的總有效率為96%，高于對照組的74%(P<0.05)；心電圖檢測結果院榦預組的總有效率為90%，高于對照組的74%(P<0.05)；兩組榦預前後的SDS、SAS評分差異有統計學意義，兩組榦預後的SDS、SAS評分差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論對伴髮的抑鬱、焦慮的心絞痛型冠心病患者進行相關心理榦預，在改善抑鬱、焦慮的同時，可明顯提高對心血管疾病的整體療效。
목적：탐토분석심리간예대심교통형관심병환자적영향。방법추취본원2013년5월수치적100례심교통형관심병환자，수궤분위간예조화대조조，매조각50례。대조조진행심장병적상관기출치료，간예조재대조조기출상동시진행심리간예。비교량조적림상료효급SDS、SAS평분。결과림상증상개선원간예조적총유효솔위96%，고우대조조적74%(P<0.05)；심전도검측결과원간예조적총유효솔위90%，고우대조조적74%(P<0.05)；량조간예전후적SDS、SAS평분차이유통계학의의，량조간예후적SDS、SAS평분차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론대반발적억욱、초필적심교통형관심병환자진행상관심리간예，재개선억욱、초필적동시，가명현제고대심혈관질병적정체료효。
Objective To discuss and analyze impact of psychological intervention on patients with coronary heart dis-ease with angina pectoris. Methods 100 patients with coronary heart disease with angina pectoris admitted into our hospital in May 2013 were selected and randomly divided into the intervention group (n=50) and the control group (n=50). In the control group,the related basic treatment for cardiac disease was provided, while in the intervention group,on the basis of the control group,psychological intervention was added.The clinical curative effect,and the SDS,SAS score in the two groups were compared. Results The improvement of clinical symptoms:the total effective rate in the inter-vention group (96%) was higher than that in the control group (74%) (P<0.05);ECG detection results:the total effec-tive rate in the intervention group (90%) was higher than that in the control group (74%) (P<0.05);there was a statistical difference of the SDS,SAS score in the two groups before and after intervention,and there was a statistical difference of the SDS,SAS score between the intervention group and the control group after intervention (P<0.05). Conclusion Psy-chological intervention carried out in patients with coronary heart disease with angina pectoris who combining with de-pression,anxiety can improve depression,anxiety,and at the same time,can significantly improve the overall effect on cardiovascular diseases.
