CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨比较氧驱动雾化吸入与压缩泵雾化吸入治疗支气管哮喘的临床效果。方法选取本院收治的支气管哮喘急性发作患者100例，随机分为两组，分别采用氧气驱动雾化吸入与压缩泵雾化吸入治疗，比较两组患者的临床疗效。结果两组患者治疗3h后临床总有效率差异无统计学意义，治疗后心率、呼吸频率、血氧浓度、最大呼气量均显著改善，氧驱动雾化吸入组心率与呼吸改善更显著。结论氧气驱动与压缩泵雾化吸入均能够有效治疗支气管哮喘，改善患者的呼吸与心率等体征，而氧气驱动改善患者体内状况更有优势。
목적：탐토비교양구동무화흡입여압축빙무화흡입치료지기관효천적림상효과。방법선취본원수치적지기관효천급성발작환자100례，수궤분위량조，분별채용양기구동무화흡입여압축빙무화흡입치료，비교량조환자적림상료효。결과량조환자치료3h후림상총유효솔차이무통계학의의，치료후심솔、호흡빈솔、혈양농도、최대호기량균현저개선，양구동무화흡입조심솔여호흡개선경현저。결론양기구동여압축빙무화흡입균능구유효치료지기관효천，개선환자적호흡여심솔등체정，이양기구동개선환자체내상황경유우세。
Objective To observe and compare the clinical efficacy of oxygen atomizing inhalation and compressor pump atomizing inhalation treating bronchitical asthma. Methods 100 cases with bronchitical asthma treated in our hospital were selected and randomly divided into two groups.Two groups were treated with oxygen atomizing inhalation and compressor pump atomizing inhalation respectively.The clinical effect of two groups were compared. Results There was no evident difference for clinical effective rate 3 hours after treatment between two groups.And the heart rate,respi-ratory rate,blood oxygen concentration and maximal expiratory volume of two groups improved evidently.And the heart rate and respiration of the group of oxygen atomizing inhalation improved more evidently. Conclusion Both oxygen at-omizing inhalation and compressor pump atomizing inhalation can effectively treat bronchitical asthma and improve the respiration and heart rate of the patients.But oxygen atomizing inhalation has advantages of improving the signs of pa-tients.