河北工程大学学报(社会科学版)
河北工程大學學報(社會科學版)
하북공정대학학보(사회과학판)
JOURNAL OF HEBEI UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING(SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION)
2014年
3期
72-74
,共3页
自由裁量权%基准刑%量刑建议%刑罚个别化
自由裁量權%基準刑%量刑建議%刑罰箇彆化
자유재량권%기준형%양형건의%형벌개별화
discretion%the baseline punishment%sentencing suggestion%the individualization of punishment
随着新刑诉法的实施,更加注重保障人权开始体现在我国刑事诉讼制度中。其中,为合理限制自由裁量权,科学确立基准刑实现刑罚个别化,我国刑事司法实践正在积极探索量刑工作的创新和改革,目前最为突出的成果是规范裁量权,将量刑建议纳入法庭审理程序。量刑建议的规范化之路是让在庭审环节控辩双方针对量刑建议问题展开充分辩论,合议庭在判决时对量刑建议采纳与否的说理,对个案的量刑进行全方位的考查,一方面有利于保障犯罪嫌疑人的诉讼权利,另一方面还有利于准确、及时惩罚犯罪,进一步推进我国量刑规范化改革向纵深处发展。
隨著新刑訴法的實施,更加註重保障人權開始體現在我國刑事訴訟製度中。其中,為閤理限製自由裁量權,科學確立基準刑實現刑罰箇彆化,我國刑事司法實踐正在積極探索量刑工作的創新和改革,目前最為突齣的成果是規範裁量權,將量刑建議納入法庭審理程序。量刑建議的規範化之路是讓在庭審環節控辯雙方針對量刑建議問題展開充分辯論,閤議庭在判決時對量刑建議採納與否的說理,對箇案的量刑進行全方位的攷查,一方麵有利于保障犯罪嫌疑人的訴訟權利,另一方麵還有利于準確、及時懲罰犯罪,進一步推進我國量刑規範化改革嚮縱深處髮展。
수착신형소법적실시,경가주중보장인권개시체현재아국형사소송제도중。기중,위합리한제자유재량권,과학학립기준형실현형벌개별화,아국형사사법실천정재적겁탐색양형공작적창신화개혁,목전최위돌출적성과시규범재량권,장양형건의납입법정심리정서。양형건의적규범화지로시양재정심배절공변쌍방침대양형건의문제전개충분변론,합의정재판결시대양형건의채납여부적설리,대개안적양형진행전방위적고사,일방면유리우보장범죄혐의인적소송권리,령일방면환유리우준학、급시징벌범죄,진일보추진아국양형규범화개혁향종심처발전。
With the implementing of the new Criminal Procedure Law,our criminal justice system pays more attention to the protection of human rights.Discretion is a reasonable limit among the article, we can establish benchmarks to achieve criminal penalties individualized scientifically,our criminal justice practice is actively exploring the work of innovation and reform sentencing.The normal discretion is the most prominent achievement currently,the sentencing recommendations put into court proceedings.Full Court should judge reasonably when ruling on whether or not the reasoning adopted by the sentencing recommendation.On the sentencing of a full range of test cases,on the one hand, there is a right of action in favor of the protection of criminal suspects,On the one hand, there is a right of action in favor of the protection of criminal suspects.We can hope to promote the development of sentencing reform to the further depth.