中国临床医生
中國臨床醫生
중국림상의생
JOURNAL OF CHINESE PHYSICIAN
2014年
10期
25-27
,共3页
韦斌%黄顺荣%钟晓刚%麦威
韋斌%黃順榮%鐘曉剛%麥威
위빈%황순영%종효강%맥위
腹腔镜胃癌根治术%开腹胃癌根治术%应激炎性因子
腹腔鏡胃癌根治術%開腹胃癌根治術%應激炎性因子
복강경위암근치술%개복위암근치술%응격염성인자
Laparoscopic radical gastrectomy%Open radical gastrectomy%Stress inflammatory cytokines
目的:探讨腹腔镜胃癌根治术与开腹胃癌根治术对患者应激炎性因子影响。方法胃癌并择期行根治性胃癌切除术治疗患者128例,随机分为腹腔镜组和开腹组各64例,腹腔镜组采取腹腔镜手术治疗,开腹组采取开腹手术治疗,对比两组患者手术及术后情况以及不同时间点应激炎性因子的变化。结果腹腔镜组患者的手术时间为(210.31±43.96)分钟,明显长于开腹组的(151.57±42.88)分钟;但腹腔镜组患者的切口长度为(5.85±1.08)cm,开腹组为(15.91±1.24)cm,腹腔镜组明显短于开腹组;术后各时点腹腔组患者的血清内皮素、一氧化氮、C-反应蛋白和白细胞介素-6等含量均明显低于开腹组,差异均有显著性。结论相比于开腹胃癌根治术,腹腔镜胃癌根治术具有创伤小、应激反应小,利于保持术后机体内环境的稳定以及促进患者术后康复的显著优势。
目的:探討腹腔鏡胃癌根治術與開腹胃癌根治術對患者應激炎性因子影響。方法胃癌併擇期行根治性胃癌切除術治療患者128例,隨機分為腹腔鏡組和開腹組各64例,腹腔鏡組採取腹腔鏡手術治療,開腹組採取開腹手術治療,對比兩組患者手術及術後情況以及不同時間點應激炎性因子的變化。結果腹腔鏡組患者的手術時間為(210.31±43.96)分鐘,明顯長于開腹組的(151.57±42.88)分鐘;但腹腔鏡組患者的切口長度為(5.85±1.08)cm,開腹組為(15.91±1.24)cm,腹腔鏡組明顯短于開腹組;術後各時點腹腔組患者的血清內皮素、一氧化氮、C-反應蛋白和白細胞介素-6等含量均明顯低于開腹組,差異均有顯著性。結論相比于開腹胃癌根治術,腹腔鏡胃癌根治術具有創傷小、應激反應小,利于保持術後機體內環境的穩定以及促進患者術後康複的顯著優勢。
목적:탐토복강경위암근치술여개복위암근치술대환자응격염성인자영향。방법위암병택기행근치성위암절제술치료환자128례,수궤분위복강경조화개복조각64례,복강경조채취복강경수술치료,개복조채취개복수술치료,대비량조환자수술급술후정황이급불동시간점응격염성인자적변화。결과복강경조환자적수술시간위(210.31±43.96)분종,명현장우개복조적(151.57±42.88)분종;단복강경조환자적절구장도위(5.85±1.08)cm,개복조위(15.91±1.24)cm,복강경조명현단우개복조;술후각시점복강조환자적혈청내피소、일양화담、C-반응단백화백세포개소-6등함량균명현저우개복조,차이균유현저성。결론상비우개복위암근치술,복강경위암근치술구유창상소、응격반응소,리우보지술후궤체내배경적은정이급촉진환자술후강복적현저우세。
Objective To investigate comparison and analysis of laparoscopic and open radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer surgery in patients with stress-inflammatory factor. Method March 2009 to October 2013 in our hospital 128 ca-ses of gastric cancer and gastric cancer undergoing radical resection were randomly divided into the laparoscopic group and open group, 64 cases in each group, the laparoscopic group take laparoscopic surgery, laparotomy group taking laparotomy surgery and postoperative comparison of two groups of patients as well as changes at different time points of stress inflammatory factors. Result Laparoscopic surgery patients time was (210. 31±43. 96) min, significantly longer than the laparotomy group (151. 57±42. 88) min;, but the length of the incision laparoscopic group patients was (5. 85±1. 08) cm, laparotomy group (15. 91±1. 24) cm, the laparoscopic group was significantly shorter in the open group; abdominal surgery patients at each time point of NO, ET, IL-6 and CRP levels were significantly lower than the open and other groups, the differences were statistically significance. Conclusion Compared to open radical gas-trectomy, Laparoscopic radical gastrectomy has a significant advantage in small trauma, small stress response, which will help maintain a stable internal environment and to promote postoperative patients’ rehabilitation.