兰州大学学报(自然科学版)
蘭州大學學報(自然科學版)
란주대학학보(자연과학판)
JOURNAL OF LANZHOU UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCES)
2014年
3期
324-332,337
,共10页
山区%地下水%MODFLOW%山区基岩补给量
山區%地下水%MODFLOW%山區基巖補給量
산구%지하수%MODFLOW%산구기암보급량
mountainous area%groundwater%MODFLOW%mountain block recharge
以祁连山大都麻河流域上游为研究区域,采用等效多孔介质的方法,利用DEM以及其他的降雨径流资料,尝试利用MODFLOW模拟山区地下水径流.考虑到山区地形复杂,地下水变化大,本文将河流概化为排水渠边界,设置两个模型分别代表不同的地下水活动层厚度.通过查阅资料及模型调试,得到模型a, b的山区基岩补给量分别为降雨量的2.762%,0.103%,模型a, b的年基流量分别为地表径流量的79.307%,77.57%,地下水蒸散发都为潜在蒸发量的36%,模型a, b的降雨补给量分别为降雨总量的67%,21%.本文利用有限的水文地质资料概化了缺乏资料山区的地下水运动,并模拟得到山区基岩补给量及基流量,为未来山区地下水勘探提供参考.
以祁連山大都痳河流域上遊為研究區域,採用等效多孔介質的方法,利用DEM以及其他的降雨徑流資料,嘗試利用MODFLOW模擬山區地下水徑流.攷慮到山區地形複雜,地下水變化大,本文將河流概化為排水渠邊界,設置兩箇模型分彆代錶不同的地下水活動層厚度.通過查閱資料及模型調試,得到模型a, b的山區基巖補給量分彆為降雨量的2.762%,0.103%,模型a, b的年基流量分彆為地錶徑流量的79.307%,77.57%,地下水蒸散髮都為潛在蒸髮量的36%,模型a, b的降雨補給量分彆為降雨總量的67%,21%.本文利用有限的水文地質資料概化瞭缺乏資料山區的地下水運動,併模擬得到山區基巖補給量及基流量,為未來山區地下水勘探提供參攷.
이기련산대도마하류역상유위연구구역,채용등효다공개질적방법,이용DEM이급기타적강우경류자료,상시이용MODFLOW모의산구지하수경류.고필도산구지형복잡,지하수변화대,본문장하류개화위배수거변계,설치량개모형분별대표불동적지하수활동층후도.통과사열자료급모형조시,득도모형a, b적산구기암보급량분별위강우량적2.762%,0.103%,모형a, b적년기류량분별위지표경류량적79.307%,77.57%,지하수증산발도위잠재증발량적36%,모형a, b적강우보급량분별위강우총량적67%,21%.본문이용유한적수문지질자료개화료결핍자료산구적지하수운동,병모의득도산구기암보급량급기류량,위미래산구지하수감탐제공삼고.
The upper reach of the Daduma River located in the Qilian Mountains was choosen as the study area. The MODFLOW model was applied to simulate the groundwater flow in the mountainous region using the equivalent porous medium based on DEM and some other hydrological data. Considering the complex topography and large fluctuations of groundwater table, we took the rivers as "leaky” boundaries and built two models representing different thickness of the active layer of groundwater. The model was first calibrated qualitatively through the review of literature and the scattered local hydrological data. Preliminary results showed that the ratio of mountain block recharge to the precipitation of model a and model b is 2.76% and 0.103% respectively. The ratio of the base flow to the surface runoff of model a and model b is 79.307% and of 77.570% respectively. The evaporation and precipitation recharge of the two models are 36% and 67%. The simulations enabled us to understand the groundwater flow in fractured rock in the data-lacking high elevation mountain watersheds, which can provide a reference for further study.