滨州医学院学报
濱州醫學院學報
빈주의학원학보
JOURNAL OF BINZHOU MEDICAL COLLEGE
2014年
3期
182-184,222
,共4页
菅金波%张鲁燕%宁方玲%李绵利%王峰%郝延璋%陈绍水
菅金波%張魯燕%寧方玲%李綿利%王峰%郝延璋%陳紹水
관금파%장로연%저방령%리면리%왕봉%학연장%진소수
乳腺癌%三阴性%耐药%卡培他滨%疗效%不良反应
乳腺癌%三陰性%耐藥%卡培他濱%療效%不良反應
유선암%삼음성%내약%잡배타빈%료효%불량반응
Breast neoplasms%T riple-negative%Resistance%Capecitabine%Effect toxicity
目的:观察以卡培他滨为主的联合化疗方案治疗对蒽环类或紫杉类耐药的晚期三阴性乳腺癌的疗效和不良反应。方法共有38例复发转移的三阴性乳腺癌患者入组,分别采用卡培他滨联合吉西他滨(GX方案)或长春瑞滨(NX方案)化疗。卡培他滨2.0 g/(m2/d),早晚各1次,餐后30 min口服,d1~14;长春瑞滨25 mg/m2,d1,8,静滴;吉西他滨1000 mg/m2,d1,8,静滴;21天为1个周期。结果38例患者共完成133个周期化疗,中位化疗周期为4个周期。本组总有效率(RR=CR+PR)为18.4%,临床获益率(CR+PR+SD)为44.7%。中位无进展生存(PFS)为7.6个月,中位总生存(OS)为12.5个月。两组化疗方案疗效无统计学差异。无化疗相关死亡病例,主要不良反应为骨髓抑制及手足综合症。结论以卡培他滨为主的两药联合方案,对晚期T NBC患者疗效有限,提示含卡培他滨的联合化疗方案可用于晚期三阴性乳腺癌,但能否作为首选方案尚需大样本、多中心的临床研究。
目的:觀察以卡培他濱為主的聯閤化療方案治療對蒽環類或紫杉類耐藥的晚期三陰性乳腺癌的療效和不良反應。方法共有38例複髮轉移的三陰性乳腺癌患者入組,分彆採用卡培他濱聯閤吉西他濱(GX方案)或長春瑞濱(NX方案)化療。卡培他濱2.0 g/(m2/d),早晚各1次,餐後30 min口服,d1~14;長春瑞濱25 mg/m2,d1,8,靜滴;吉西他濱1000 mg/m2,d1,8,靜滴;21天為1箇週期。結果38例患者共完成133箇週期化療,中位化療週期為4箇週期。本組總有效率(RR=CR+PR)為18.4%,臨床穫益率(CR+PR+SD)為44.7%。中位無進展生存(PFS)為7.6箇月,中位總生存(OS)為12.5箇月。兩組化療方案療效無統計學差異。無化療相關死亡病例,主要不良反應為骨髓抑製及手足綜閤癥。結論以卡培他濱為主的兩藥聯閤方案,對晚期T NBC患者療效有限,提示含卡培他濱的聯閤化療方案可用于晚期三陰性乳腺癌,但能否作為首選方案尚需大樣本、多中心的臨床研究。
목적:관찰이잡배타빈위주적연합화료방안치료대은배류혹자삼류내약적만기삼음성유선암적료효화불량반응。방법공유38례복발전이적삼음성유선암환자입조,분별채용잡배타빈연합길서타빈(GX방안)혹장춘서빈(NX방안)화료。잡배타빈2.0 g/(m2/d),조만각1차,찬후30 min구복,d1~14;장춘서빈25 mg/m2,d1,8,정적;길서타빈1000 mg/m2,d1,8,정적;21천위1개주기。결과38례환자공완성133개주기화료,중위화료주기위4개주기。본조총유효솔(RR=CR+PR)위18.4%,림상획익솔(CR+PR+SD)위44.7%。중위무진전생존(PFS)위7.6개월,중위총생존(OS)위12.5개월。량조화료방안료효무통계학차이。무화료상관사망병례,주요불량반응위골수억제급수족종합증。결론이잡배타빈위주적량약연합방안,대만기T NBC환자료효유한,제시함잡배타빈적연합화료방안가용우만기삼음성유선암,단능부작위수선방안상수대양본、다중심적림상연구。
Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and tolerability of capecitabine-based combination chemotherapy in the treatment of the anthracycline and taxane-resistant metastatic TNBC .Methods All 38 patients with metastatic breast cancer were recruited to receive either GX regimen ( capecitabine 2.0 g/m2 ,bid ,d1-14 ,gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 ,d1 ,8 iv ) or NX regi-men (capecitabine 2.0 g/m2 ,bid ,d1-14 ,vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 ,d1 ,8 iv ) .There were twenty-one days in a cycle .Results All 38 patients completed 133 chemotherapy cycles with a four-cycle median per patients .The overall response rate (CR+ PR) was 18.4% and clinical benefit rate was (CR+ PR+SD) 44.7% .The median time of progression(PFS) was 7.6 months ,OS was 12.5 months .The efficacy between of different chemotherapy regimens wans not significantly different .No patient died due to chemotherapy .The main toxicity was myelosuppression and hand -foot syndrome .Conclusion The efficacy of capecitabine con-tained GX or NX regimen was relatively poor in mTNBC patients ,suggesting capecitabine -based combination chemotherapy may be considered to be acceptable ,but if it could be a preferred ,we need large sample and multi-center study .