广西医学
廣西醫學
엄서의학
GUANGXI MEDICAL JOURNAL
2014年
6期
733-735
,共3页
薛乾隆%贺英%岳秉宏%韩树池%陈艳梅%高继英%张秀谦
薛乾隆%賀英%嶽秉宏%韓樹池%陳豔梅%高繼英%張秀謙
설건륭%하영%악병굉%한수지%진염매%고계영%장수겸
心肺复苏%心脏停搏%心血管衰竭%危险因素
心肺複囌%心髒停搏%心血管衰竭%危險因素
심폐복소%심장정박%심혈관쇠갈%위험인소
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation%Cardiac arrest%Cardiovascular failure%Risk factor
目的:探讨心肺复苏成功患者发生心血管衰竭的影响因素,以期为患者的预后提供理论依据。方法根据心肺复苏自主循环恢复( ROSC)后是否出现心血管衰竭将患者分为心血管衰竭组75例和非心血管衰竭组31例。收集两组患者年龄、性别、心血管病史、心肺复苏时间以及复苏前生命体征等资料,对两组患者临床资料进行对比分析。结果两组患者年龄、性别及心血管病史差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05);心血管衰竭组患者死亡率明显高于非心血管衰竭组( P<0.05);心血管衰竭组患者APACHEⅡ评分为(30.54±8.49)分、SOFA评分为(14.65±5.14)分,均明显高于非心血管衰竭组的(19.74±9.76)分及(6.49±4.56)分( P<0.05)。心血管衰竭组发病初始可除颤心律比例明显低于非心血管衰竭组( P<0.05)。 logistic回归分析显示,复苏持续时间、复苏前存在全身炎症反应综合征( SIRS )、复苏前血糖紊乱均为患者发生早期心血管衰竭的独立影响因素。结论复苏持续时间、复苏前存在SIRS以及复苏前血糖紊乱均是患者发生早期心血管衰竭的独立影响因素。
目的:探討心肺複囌成功患者髮生心血管衰竭的影響因素,以期為患者的預後提供理論依據。方法根據心肺複囌自主循環恢複( ROSC)後是否齣現心血管衰竭將患者分為心血管衰竭組75例和非心血管衰竭組31例。收集兩組患者年齡、性彆、心血管病史、心肺複囌時間以及複囌前生命體徵等資料,對兩組患者臨床資料進行對比分析。結果兩組患者年齡、性彆及心血管病史差異無統計學意義(P均>0.05);心血管衰竭組患者死亡率明顯高于非心血管衰竭組( P<0.05);心血管衰竭組患者APACHEⅡ評分為(30.54±8.49)分、SOFA評分為(14.65±5.14)分,均明顯高于非心血管衰竭組的(19.74±9.76)分及(6.49±4.56)分( P<0.05)。心血管衰竭組髮病初始可除顫心律比例明顯低于非心血管衰竭組( P<0.05)。 logistic迴歸分析顯示,複囌持續時間、複囌前存在全身炎癥反應綜閤徵( SIRS )、複囌前血糖紊亂均為患者髮生早期心血管衰竭的獨立影響因素。結論複囌持續時間、複囌前存在SIRS以及複囌前血糖紊亂均是患者髮生早期心血管衰竭的獨立影響因素。
목적:탐토심폐복소성공환자발생심혈관쇠갈적영향인소,이기위환자적예후제공이론의거。방법근거심폐복소자주순배회복( ROSC)후시부출현심혈관쇠갈장환자분위심혈관쇠갈조75례화비심혈관쇠갈조31례。수집량조환자년령、성별、심혈관병사、심폐복소시간이급복소전생명체정등자료,대량조환자림상자료진행대비분석。결과량조환자년령、성별급심혈관병사차이무통계학의의(P균>0.05);심혈관쇠갈조환자사망솔명현고우비심혈관쇠갈조( P<0.05);심혈관쇠갈조환자APACHEⅡ평분위(30.54±8.49)분、SOFA평분위(14.65±5.14)분,균명현고우비심혈관쇠갈조적(19.74±9.76)분급(6.49±4.56)분( P<0.05)。심혈관쇠갈조발병초시가제전심률비례명현저우비심혈관쇠갈조( P<0.05)。 logistic회귀분석현시,복소지속시간、복소전존재전신염증반응종합정( SIRS )、복소전혈당문란균위환자발생조기심혈관쇠갈적독립영향인소。결론복소지속시간、복소전존재SIRS이급복소전혈당문란균시환자발생조기심혈관쇠갈적독립영향인소。
Objective To explore the influence factors for cardiovascular failure following successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation to provide a theoretical basis for the patients′prognosis .Methods The patients with cardiovascular failure following resumption of spontaneous circulation ( ROSC ) were enrolled in cardiovascular failure group,and the patients without cardiovascular failure following ROSC were enrolled in non -cardiovascular failure group . The data of patient′s age ,gender ,history of cardiovascular disease ,cardiopulmonary resuscitation duration and vital signs before recovery were collected in both groups ,and the clinical data were analyzed .Results Age,gender and history of cardiovascular disease showed no significant difference between two groups (all P>0.05).The mortality in the cardiovascular failure group was significantly higher than that in the non-cardiovascular failure group ( P<0.05).The APACHEⅡscore and SOFA score in the cardiovascular failure group were significantly higher than those in the non -cardiovascular failure group[(30.54 ±8.49) vs.(19.74 ±9.76),(14.65 ±5.14) vs.(6.49 ±4.56),P<0.05].The proportion of patients in initial onset of correctable cardiac dysrhythmia in the cardiovascular failure group was lower than that in the non-cardiovascular failure group ( P<0.05) .Logistic regression analysis suggested that recovery duration ,systemic inflammatory response syndrome ( SIRS ) before recovery , blood glucose disorders before recovery were independent influence factors for early cardiovascular failure .Conclusion Recovery duration , SIRS and blood glucose disorders before recovery are independent risk factors for early cardiovascular failure .