微创泌尿外科杂志
微創泌尿外科雜誌
미창비뇨외과잡지
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE UROLOGY
2014年
2期
73-76
,共4页
冯建伟%祖强%孙圣坤%卢锦山%史立新%蔡伟%孙博%张旭%董隽
馮建偉%祖彊%孫聖坤%盧錦山%史立新%蔡偉%孫博%張旭%董雋
풍건위%조강%손골곤%로금산%사립신%채위%손박%장욱%동준
单孔腹腔镜手术%肾切除术%腹膜后腔%肾癌
單孔腹腔鏡手術%腎切除術%腹膜後腔%腎癌
단공복강경수술%신절제술%복막후강%신암
laparoendoscopic si ngle-site surgery%nephrecto my%retroperitoneu m%renal cancer
目的:通过与标准后腹腔镜根治性肾切除术进行对照研究,评估单孔后腹腔镜根治性肾切除术的临床疗效.方法:2011年4月~2012年8月,行单孔后腹腔镜根治性肾切除术53例,随机选择同一时期行标准后腹腔镜根治性肾切除术53例,将两组资料的临床及病理指标进行对照研究.结果:两组病例的术后切口引流管拔除时间分别为(3.20±1.45)d 和(3.80±1.80)d ,术后住院天数分别为(6.60±1.50)d 和(7.30±1.82)d ,均差异有统计学意义(P <0.05).两组病例的性别、年龄、体质指数、手术时间、手术失血量、术后第1、2、3天的切口引流量、手术部位、肿瘤位置、肿瘤大小、TNM 分期、Fuhr man 分级、术中术后并发症均差异无统计学意义(P >0.05).两组各有1例患者中转开放手术.结论:与标准后腹腔镜比较,单孔后腹腔镜根治性肾切除术安全可行,可缩短住院时间,具有较好的美容效果.
目的:通過與標準後腹腔鏡根治性腎切除術進行對照研究,評估單孔後腹腔鏡根治性腎切除術的臨床療效.方法:2011年4月~2012年8月,行單孔後腹腔鏡根治性腎切除術53例,隨機選擇同一時期行標準後腹腔鏡根治性腎切除術53例,將兩組資料的臨床及病理指標進行對照研究.結果:兩組病例的術後切口引流管拔除時間分彆為(3.20±1.45)d 和(3.80±1.80)d ,術後住院天數分彆為(6.60±1.50)d 和(7.30±1.82)d ,均差異有統計學意義(P <0.05).兩組病例的性彆、年齡、體質指數、手術時間、手術失血量、術後第1、2、3天的切口引流量、手術部位、腫瘤位置、腫瘤大小、TNM 分期、Fuhr man 分級、術中術後併髮癥均差異無統計學意義(P >0.05).兩組各有1例患者中轉開放手術.結論:與標準後腹腔鏡比較,單孔後腹腔鏡根治性腎切除術安全可行,可縮短住院時間,具有較好的美容效果.
목적:통과여표준후복강경근치성신절제술진행대조연구,평고단공후복강경근치성신절제술적림상료효.방법:2011년4월~2012년8월,행단공후복강경근치성신절제술53례,수궤선택동일시기행표준후복강경근치성신절제술53례,장량조자료적림상급병리지표진행대조연구.결과:량조병례적술후절구인류관발제시간분별위(3.20±1.45)d 화(3.80±1.80)d ,술후주원천수분별위(6.60±1.50)d 화(7.30±1.82)d ,균차이유통계학의의(P <0.05).량조병례적성별、년령、체질지수、수술시간、수술실혈량、술후제1、2、3천적절구인류량、수술부위、종류위치、종류대소、TNM 분기、Fuhr man 분급、술중술후병발증균차이무통계학의의(P >0.05).량조각유1례환자중전개방수술.결론:여표준후복강경비교,단공후복강경근치성신절제술안전가행,가축단주원시간,구유교호적미용효과.
To assess the clinicalefficacy of retroperitoneallaparoendoscopic single-site radicalnephrec-to my (LESSRN)versus standard laparoscopic radicalnephrecto my (SLAN).Methods :Bet ween April201 1 and Au-gust 201 2 ,53 patients with renalcancer in our center under went retroperitoneal LESSRN by using a ho me made sin-gle- port device ,and during the sa me peri od ,53 cases undergoing SLAN were rando mly analyzed .The clinicaland pathologicalpara meters of the t wo groups were analyzed ,including gender ,age ,body mass index ,operati ve ti me , esti mated blood loss ,drainage volu me of the wound ,wound drainage tube re moval,hospitalstay ,operati ve si de , tu mor size ,tu mor locati on ,clinicalTNMstage ,Fuhr man grade ,and co mplicati ons .Results :No si gnificant differ-ences were found in gender ,age ,body mass index ,operati ve ti me ,esti mated blood loss ,operati ve si de ,tu mor size , tu mor locati on ,clinicalTNMstage ,Fuhr man grade ,and co mplicati ons bet ween t wo groups (P >0 .05 ).The ti me of wound drainage tube re movaland hospitalstay in the LESSRN group were si gnificantly shorter than in SLAN group (P <0 .05 ).Conclusions :Co mpared with SLAN ,retroperitonealLESSRN using a ho me made single- port device is a safe and feasi ble procedure for manage ment of localized renalcancer ,and have provi ded a better cos metic outco me and shorter hospitalstays .