中国药师
中國藥師
중국약사
CHINA PHARMACIST
2014年
2期
221-224
,共4页
廖欣%汪玥%钱文慧%黄鲁%苏华%任海祥
廖訢%汪玥%錢文慧%黃魯%囌華%任海祥
료흔%왕모%전문혜%황로%소화%임해상
天麻蜜环菌粉%薄层鉴别%多糖%3,5-二硝基水杨酸光度法%肽%Folin-酚法%含量测定
天痳蜜環菌粉%薄層鑒彆%多糖%3,5-二硝基水楊痠光度法%肽%Folin-酚法%含量測定
천마밀배균분%박층감별%다당%3,5-이초기수양산광도법%태%Folin-분법%함량측정
Gastrodia tuder halimasch powder%TLC%Polysaccharides%DNS method%Peptide%Forint phenol method%Determi-nation
目的::建立蛭芪康胶囊的质量控制方法。方法:采用薄层色谱法对制剂中的天麻蜜环菌粉、大黄、黄芪进行定性鉴别。采用3,5-二硝基水杨酸光度法(DNS)测定制剂多糖含量,采用Folin-酚法(Lowry法)测定制剂肽含量。结果:定性鉴别检出制剂中的天麻蜜环菌粉、大黄、黄芪;DNS法测定结果,多糖在6.412~32.060μg·ml-1的范围内呈良好的线性关系( r=0.9995),平均回收率为95.86%,RSD为0.86%(n=6);Folin-酚法测定结果,肽在0.0597~0.2984 mg·ml-1范围内呈良好的线性关系(r=0.9990),平均回收率为100.3%,RSD为1.88%(n=6)。结论:本方法简便、准确,可作为该制剂的质控方法。
目的::建立蛭芪康膠囊的質量控製方法。方法:採用薄層色譜法對製劑中的天痳蜜環菌粉、大黃、黃芪進行定性鑒彆。採用3,5-二硝基水楊痠光度法(DNS)測定製劑多糖含量,採用Folin-酚法(Lowry法)測定製劑肽含量。結果:定性鑒彆檢齣製劑中的天痳蜜環菌粉、大黃、黃芪;DNS法測定結果,多糖在6.412~32.060μg·ml-1的範圍內呈良好的線性關繫( r=0.9995),平均迴收率為95.86%,RSD為0.86%(n=6);Folin-酚法測定結果,肽在0.0597~0.2984 mg·ml-1範圍內呈良好的線性關繫(r=0.9990),平均迴收率為100.3%,RSD為1.88%(n=6)。結論:本方法簡便、準確,可作為該製劑的質控方法。
목적::건립질기강효낭적질량공제방법。방법:채용박층색보법대제제중적천마밀배균분、대황、황기진행정성감별。채용3,5-이초기수양산광도법(DNS)측정제제다당함량,채용Folin-분법(Lowry법)측정제제태함량。결과:정성감별검출제제중적천마밀배균분、대황、황기;DNS법측정결과,다당재6.412~32.060μg·ml-1적범위내정량호적선성관계( r=0.9995),평균회수솔위95.86%,RSD위0.86%(n=6);Folin-분법측정결과,태재0.0597~0.2984 mg·ml-1범위내정량호적선성관계(r=0.9990),평균회수솔위100.3%,RSD위1.88%(n=6)。결론:본방법간편、준학,가작위해제제적질공방법。
Objective:To establish the quality control of Zhiqikang capsules. Methods:TLC was used to identify Gastrodia tuder halimasch, rhubarb and Astragalus mongholicus in the preparations. A spectrophotometry method with 3, 5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) was used to measure the polysaccharide content in Zhiqikang capsules. A spectrophotometry method with Forint phenol method ( Low-ry) was used to measure the peptide content in the capsules. Results:The linear range of polysaccharide was obtained between 6. 412 and 32. 060μg·ml-1(r=0. 999 5), the average recovery was 95. 86% and RSD was 0. 86%. The linear range of peptide was ob-tained between 0.059 7 and 0.298 4 mg·ml-1(r=0.999 0), the average recovery was 100.3% and RSD was 1.88%(n=6). Conclusion:The assay method is simple and accurate in the quality control of the preparations.