中华行为医学与脑科学杂志
中華行為醫學與腦科學雜誌
중화행위의학여뇌과학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE AND BRAIN SCIENCE
2012年
12期
1119-1121
,共3页
心理剧干预%犯罪青少年%应对方式
心理劇榦預%犯罪青少年%應對方式
심리극간예%범죄청소년%응대방식
Psychodrama Intervention%Young offenders%Coping style
目的 探讨有针对性的心理剧干预对犯罪青少年应对方式的影响.方法 设计有针对性的心理剧干预程序；选择某未成年劳动教养管理所60名青少年,分为试验组和对照组,并对试验组青少年进行心理剧干预；使用简易应对方式问卷对干预前后两组青少年应对方式进行测评.结果 干预前试验组青少年的积极应对方式评分为(1.40±0.42)分,消极应对方式评分为(2.19±0.32)分,干预后积极应对方式为(2.13±0.36)分；消极应对方式为(1.77±0.30)分；试验组在干预前后积极应对方式、消极应对方式得分均差异有统计学意义(t=-6.223,P＜0.01；t=9.749,P＜0.01).对照组干预前后积极应对消极应对评分差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论 心理剧干预对犯罪青少年的应对方式有积极的影响作用,可增强其社会适应性.
目的 探討有針對性的心理劇榦預對犯罪青少年應對方式的影響.方法 設計有針對性的心理劇榦預程序；選擇某未成年勞動教養管理所60名青少年,分為試驗組和對照組,併對試驗組青少年進行心理劇榦預；使用簡易應對方式問捲對榦預前後兩組青少年應對方式進行測評.結果 榦預前試驗組青少年的積極應對方式評分為(1.40±0.42)分,消極應對方式評分為(2.19±0.32)分,榦預後積極應對方式為(2.13±0.36)分；消極應對方式為(1.77±0.30)分；試驗組在榦預前後積極應對方式、消極應對方式得分均差異有統計學意義(t=-6.223,P＜0.01；t=9.749,P＜0.01).對照組榦預前後積極應對消極應對評分差異無統計學意義(P＞0.05).結論 心理劇榦預對犯罪青少年的應對方式有積極的影響作用,可增彊其社會適應性.
목적 탐토유침대성적심리극간예대범죄청소년응대방식적영향.방법 설계유침대성적심리극간예정서；선택모미성년노동교양관리소60명청소년,분위시험조화대조조,병대시험조청소년진행심리극간예；사용간역응대방식문권대간예전후량조청소년응대방식진행측평.결과 간예전시험조청소년적적겁응대방식평분위(1.40±0.42)분,소겁응대방식평분위(2.19±0.32)분,간예후적겁응대방식위(2.13±0.36)분；소겁응대방식위(1.77±0.30)분；시험조재간예전후적겁응대방식、소겁응대방식득분균차이유통계학의의(t=-6.223,P＜0.01；t=9.749,P＜0.01).대조조간예전후적겁응대소겁응대평분차이무통계학의의(P＞0.05).결론 심리극간예대범죄청소년적응대방식유적겁적영향작용,가증강기사회괄응성.
Objective To explore effective coping style of targeted psychodrama on teenager offenders.Methods Targeted psychodrama intervention procedures were designed.60 teenagers selected from juvenile detention jail were randomly divided into experimental group and control group.Psychodrama intervention was applied to the experimental group to test the changes of the two groups before and after the intervention using simplified coping style questionnaire.Results Before the intervention,the positive coping style level of the experimental group was 1.40 ± 0.42,the negative coping style level was 2.19 ± 0.32; after the intervention,the positive coping style level of the experimental group was 2.13 ± 0.36,the negative coping style level was 1.77 ±0.30.The difference of the experimental group's positive response and the negative response were significant before and after the intervention(t =-6.223,P＜ 0.01; t =9.749,P＜0.01).The difference of the control group's positive response and the negative response were not significant (P ＞ 0.05).Conclusion Psychodrama intervention has a positive effect on the criminal teenagers coping styles,and it can improve their social adaptability.
