CAJ | 학술논문

目的：通过分析两种引流在腮腺切除术中的临床疗效，探讨负压引流在腮腺切除术中的应用价值。方法将269例接受腮腺切除术的患者随机分成负压引流组（A组，135例）和皮片引流组（B组，134例），观察并记录2组的住院天数、一期愈合率和并发症发生率。结果 A组较B组住院天数短、提高了一期愈合率和减少了并发症发生率。结论负压引流的临床疗效优于皮片引流，值得在临床上推广使用。
목적：통과분석량충인류재시선절제술중적림상료효，탐토부압인류재시선절제술중적응용개치。방법장269례접수시선절제술적환자수궤분성부압인류조（A조，135례）화피편인류조（B조，134례），관찰병기록2조적주원천수、일기유합솔화병발증발생솔。결과 A조교B조주원천수단、제고료일기유합솔화감소료병발증발생솔。결론부압인류적림상료효우우피편인류，치득재림상상추엄사용。
Objective To observe the efficacy of the application of negative pressure drainage and rubber drainage in patients with parotid gland surgery. Methods 269 patients receiving parotidectomy were randomly divided into negative pressure drainage group (Group A, 135 patients) and rubber drainage group (Group B, 134 patients). Healing efficacy of these two methods were in terms of the hospital days, first stage healing rate and the incidences of complications, such as hematoma, effusion, necrosis of skin flap and salivary fistula. Results Group A had the advantages of shorter hospital days, less complications and the improved first stage healing rate. Conclusion Negative pressure drainage is superior to rubber drainage in parotid gland surgery. It is worth extending for its clinical application.