CAJ | 학술논문

目的：评价等离子双极电切治疗前列腺增生的疗效、安全性及短期结果。方法将99例前列腺增生患者随机分成两组，49例归纳入等离子双极电切组，50例归纳入气化电切组，所有患者术前给予相关指标及术后半年随访结果评估。结果两组患者术前情况相似，所有患者均手术成功。术后尿管留置时间、术后住院时间等离子双极电切组均明显少于气化电切组，且两组患者术后1、3及6个月在IPSS、Qmax指标方面，等离子双极电切组均明显优于气化电切组（P＜0.05）。结论等离子双极电切术在效率、安全性及短期结果方面明显优于气化电切组，是前列腺增生患者的另一种更好的治疗方案。
목적：평개등리자쌍겁전절치료전렬선증생적료효、안전성급단기결과。방법장99례전렬선증생환자수궤분성량조，49례귀납입등리자쌍겁전절조，50례귀납입기화전절조，소유환자술전급여상관지표급술후반년수방결과평고。결과량조환자술전정황상사，소유환자균수술성공。술후뇨관류치시간、술후주원시간등리자쌍겁전절조균명현소우기화전절조，차량조환자술후1、3급6개월재IPSS、Qmax지표방면，등리자쌍겁전절조균명현우우기화전절조（P＜0.05）。결론등리자쌍겁전절술재효솔、안전성급단기결과방면명현우우기화전절조，시전렬선증생환자적령일충경호적치료방안。
To evaluate the efficiency, safety and short term outcome of transurethral resection in saline plasma vaporization of the prostate(TUPKP).Methods 99 BPH patients were divided in to 2 groups, 49 patients underwent transurethral prostatectomy with TUPKP, and 50 patients underwent TURP+TUVP. All patients were evaluated preoperatively and 6 months after surgery by related indicators.Results Patients from both series had similar preoperative characteristics. TUPKP and TURP+TUVP were successfully performed in all cases, the catheterization period and hospital stay were significantly shorter for TUPKP patients. At the 1, 3 and 6 months follow-ups,improvements in the variables measured were better in the TUPKP group: the IPSS and the Qmax(allP<0.05). Conclusion The efficiency, safety and short term results of TUPKP are significantly better than TURP+TUVP.It is another better treatment for patients with BPH.