河北医学
河北醫學
하북의학
HEBEI MEDICINE
2014年
11期
1764-1767
,共4页
中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞( NLR)%CA125%CA199%子宫内膜异位症%子宫腺肌病%子宫肌瘤
中性粒細胞/淋巴細胞( NLR)%CA125%CA199%子宮內膜異位癥%子宮腺肌病%子宮肌瘤
중성립세포/림파세포( NLR)%CA125%CA199%자궁내막이위증%자궁선기병%자궁기류
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio%CA125%CA199%Endometdosis%Adenomyosis%Hysteromyoma
探讨血中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值( NLR)检测在子宫内膜异位症、子宫腺肌病和子宫肌瘤的临床意义。方法:选取2011年3月至2013年6月在我院手术治疗且病理类型确诊为子宫内膜异位症患者65例(A组),子宫腺肌病患者72例(B组),子宫肌瘤患者75例(C组),健康女性70例( D组)为研究对象,共212例,均进行术前或体检时血中性粒细胞、淋巴细胞、CAl25和CAl99的测定,评价血清指标在诊断3种疾病方面的敏感性和特异性。结果:A、B、C三组血NLR值均明显大于D组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 CA125诊断A组(66.154)、B组(80.556)疾病的敏感性明显大于C组(18.667),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);CA199在诊断三种疾病的敏感性上,A组(33.846)>B组(18.056)>C组(5.333),差异有统计学意义( P<0.05)。结论:NLR是一种新的炎症评价指标,对子宫内膜异位症、子宫腺肌病和子宫肌瘤的诊断具有一定意义。
探討血中性粒細胞/淋巴細胞比值( NLR)檢測在子宮內膜異位癥、子宮腺肌病和子宮肌瘤的臨床意義。方法:選取2011年3月至2013年6月在我院手術治療且病理類型確診為子宮內膜異位癥患者65例(A組),子宮腺肌病患者72例(B組),子宮肌瘤患者75例(C組),健康女性70例( D組)為研究對象,共212例,均進行術前或體檢時血中性粒細胞、淋巴細胞、CAl25和CAl99的測定,評價血清指標在診斷3種疾病方麵的敏感性和特異性。結果:A、B、C三組血NLR值均明顯大于D組,差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05)。 CA125診斷A組(66.154)、B組(80.556)疾病的敏感性明顯大于C組(18.667),差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);CA199在診斷三種疾病的敏感性上,A組(33.846)>B組(18.056)>C組(5.333),差異有統計學意義( P<0.05)。結論:NLR是一種新的炎癥評價指標,對子宮內膜異位癥、子宮腺肌病和子宮肌瘤的診斷具有一定意義。
탐토혈중성립세포/림파세포비치( NLR)검측재자궁내막이위증、자궁선기병화자궁기류적림상의의。방법:선취2011년3월지2013년6월재아원수술치료차병리류형학진위자궁내막이위증환자65례(A조),자궁선기병환자72례(B조),자궁기류환자75례(C조),건강녀성70례( D조)위연구대상,공212례,균진행술전혹체검시혈중성립세포、림파세포、CAl25화CAl99적측정,평개혈청지표재진단3충질병방면적민감성화특이성。결과:A、B、C삼조혈NLR치균명현대우D조,차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05)。 CA125진단A조(66.154)、B조(80.556)질병적민감성명현대우C조(18.667),차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);CA199재진단삼충질병적민감성상,A조(33.846)>B조(18.056)>C조(5.333),차이유통계학의의( P<0.05)。결론:NLR시일충신적염증평개지표,대자궁내막이위증、자궁선기병화자궁기류적진단구유일정의의。
To explore the clinical significance of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio(NLR) in endometriosis , adenomyosis and hysteromyoma .Method:212 cases were enrolled in this study from 2011 to 2013, and were divided into four groups , 65 cases with endometriosis (group A), 72 cases with adenomyosis (group B), 75 cases with hysteromyoma(group C) and 70 cases of health women(group D).Leucocyte number, lymphocyte number , CA125 and CA199 were detected and analysed by software SPSS .Sensitivity and speciality were assesed .Result:NLR was obviously higher in group A , group B and group C than that in group D.The differences were statistically significant ( P<0.05 ) .The sensitivity of diagnosis by CA 125 showed that group A(66.154) and group B(80.556) were much higher than that in group C (18.667).The differences were statistically significant ( P<0.05) .The sensitivity of diagnosis by CA 129 showed that in group A(33.846)>group B(18.056)>group C(5.333).The differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion:NLR is a new index of inflammatory reaction , which has certain value for the diagnosis of pa-tients with endometriosis , adenomyosis or hysteromyoma .