检验医学与临床
檢驗醫學與臨床
검험의학여림상
JOURNAL OF LABORATORY MEDICINE AND CLINICAL SCIENCES
2014年
13期
1764-1766
,共3页
朱建锋%张莉%王蓓丽%张春燕%郭玮%潘柏申
硃建鋒%張莉%王蓓麗%張春燕%郭瑋%潘柏申
주건봉%장리%왕배려%장춘연%곽위%반백신
血细胞分析仪%有核红细胞%血细胞计数
血細胞分析儀%有覈紅細胞%血細胞計數
혈세포분석의%유핵홍세포%혈세포계수
blood cell analyzer%nucleated red blood cells%blood cell counting
评价Sysmex XE-2100血细胞分析仪计数外周血有核红细胞(NRBC)的性能。方法选择门诊与住院患者乙二胺四乙酸二钾抗凝血标本,采用Sysmex XE-2100血细胞分析仪与手工显微镜方法计数NRBC ,并对结果进行比较。结果血细胞分析仪与手工显微镜方法之间相关性良好,相关系数为0.9384;58份标本仪器法N RBC在0.00%~0.99%标本中14份(24.1%)手工法 N RBC 结果为0.00%。24份仪器法 N RBC 结果为0.00%的标本中22份(91.2%)手工法小于或等于1.00%;仪器法重复性明显好于手工法,NRBC 平均 CV 为8.0%。结论 Sysmex XE-2100血细胞分析仪与手工显微镜法之间相关性较好;仪器法重复性明显好于手工法;尽管出现少量仪器法与镜检法不一致结果,但均伴有其他白细胞和(或)血小板异常报警提示,也进行了显微镜复核。
評價Sysmex XE-2100血細胞分析儀計數外週血有覈紅細胞(NRBC)的性能。方法選擇門診與住院患者乙二胺四乙痠二鉀抗凝血標本,採用Sysmex XE-2100血細胞分析儀與手工顯微鏡方法計數NRBC ,併對結果進行比較。結果血細胞分析儀與手工顯微鏡方法之間相關性良好,相關繫數為0.9384;58份標本儀器法N RBC在0.00%~0.99%標本中14份(24.1%)手工法 N RBC 結果為0.00%。24份儀器法 N RBC 結果為0.00%的標本中22份(91.2%)手工法小于或等于1.00%;儀器法重複性明顯好于手工法,NRBC 平均 CV 為8.0%。結論 Sysmex XE-2100血細胞分析儀與手工顯微鏡法之間相關性較好;儀器法重複性明顯好于手工法;儘管齣現少量儀器法與鏡檢法不一緻結果,但均伴有其他白細胞和(或)血小闆異常報警提示,也進行瞭顯微鏡複覈。
평개Sysmex XE-2100혈세포분석의계수외주혈유핵홍세포(NRBC)적성능。방법선택문진여주원환자을이알사을산이갑항응혈표본,채용Sysmex XE-2100혈세포분석의여수공현미경방법계수NRBC ,병대결과진행비교。결과혈세포분석의여수공현미경방법지간상관성량호,상관계수위0.9384;58빈표본의기법N RBC재0.00%~0.99%표본중14빈(24.1%)수공법 N RBC 결과위0.00%。24빈의기법 N RBC 결과위0.00%적표본중22빈(91.2%)수공법소우혹등우1.00%;의기법중복성명현호우수공법,NRBC 평균 CV 위8.0%。결론 Sysmex XE-2100혈세포분석의여수공현미경법지간상관성교호;의기법중복성명현호우수공법;진관출현소량의기법여경검법불일치결과,단균반유기타백세포화(혹)혈소판이상보경제시,야진행료현미경복핵。
Objective To evaluate the performance of Sysmex XE‐2100 analyzer for detection of nucleated red cells (NRBC) in peripheral blood .Methods Peripheral blood samples ,collected from in‐patients and out‐patients and anticoagulated by ethylene diamine tetraacetate dipotassium ,were detected by Sysmex XE‐2100 analyzer and manual method using microscope and Wright‐Giemsa stained smear .Then the results were analyzed .Results Correlation co‐efficient of the results detected by analyzer and manual method was 0 .938 4 .Among the 58 samples ,with the NRBC percentage of 0 .00% -0 .99% detected by analyzer ,there were 14 samples with NRBC percentage of 0 .00% ,detec‐ted by manual method ,accounting for 24 .1% .Among the 24 samples ,with the NRBC percentage of 0 .00% detected by analyzer ,there were 22 sampels with NRBC percentage less than or equal with 1 .00% ,accounting for 91 .2% .The reproducibility of analyzer was better than manual method ,and the coefficient of variability of the former was 8 .0% . Conclusion There could be fine correlation between the Syxmex XE‐2100 analyzer and manual method .The repro‐ducibility of analyzer might be better than manual method .A few samples could be with different results ,detected by analyzer and manual method ,but the analyzer could supply warning flag to perform manual review .