医药前沿
醫藥前沿
의약전연
YIAYAO QIANYAN
2014年
19期
147-148
,共2页
护理干预%泌尿外科患者%心理特征%生活质量
護理榦預%泌尿外科患者%心理特徵%生活質量
호리간예%비뇨외과환자%심리특정%생활질량
patients of Department of Urology%nursing intervention%psychological characteristics%quality of life
探讨临床护理干预对泌尿外科患者心理特征及生活质量的影响。方法:对我院接收治疗的100例泌尿外科患者资料进行分析,根据患者入院时间顺序分为两组,每组有50例患者。对照组进行一般护理,实验组采用临床护理干预进行护理,观察并比较两组患者的心理状态的差异。结果:干预前实验组患者中有34例抑郁,26例焦虑和对照组相比没有统计学意义( P>0.05);干预之后,实验组有7例抑郁,4例焦虑低于对照组(16例抑郁、13例焦虑)( P<0.05);实验组患者入院前SAS评分为(48.21±6.14)和对照组相比没有统计学意义(P>0.05);干预后,实验中手术前SAS评分为(32.11±3.54)低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:在泌尿外科疾病治疗过程中,实施临床护理干预能够有效的调节患者的心理状态,对其生活质量也有很大的促进和提高,值得推广使用。
探討臨床護理榦預對泌尿外科患者心理特徵及生活質量的影響。方法:對我院接收治療的100例泌尿外科患者資料進行分析,根據患者入院時間順序分為兩組,每組有50例患者。對照組進行一般護理,實驗組採用臨床護理榦預進行護理,觀察併比較兩組患者的心理狀態的差異。結果:榦預前實驗組患者中有34例抑鬱,26例焦慮和對照組相比沒有統計學意義( P>0.05);榦預之後,實驗組有7例抑鬱,4例焦慮低于對照組(16例抑鬱、13例焦慮)( P<0.05);實驗組患者入院前SAS評分為(48.21±6.14)和對照組相比沒有統計學意義(P>0.05);榦預後,實驗中手術前SAS評分為(32.11±3.54)低于對照組(P<0.05)。結論:在泌尿外科疾病治療過程中,實施臨床護理榦預能夠有效的調節患者的心理狀態,對其生活質量也有很大的促進和提高,值得推廣使用。
탐토림상호리간예대비뇨외과환자심리특정급생활질량적영향。방법:대아원접수치료적100례비뇨외과환자자료진행분석,근거환자입원시간순서분위량조,매조유50례환자。대조조진행일반호리,실험조채용림상호리간예진행호리,관찰병비교량조환자적심리상태적차이。결과:간예전실험조환자중유34례억욱,26례초필화대조조상비몰유통계학의의( P>0.05);간예지후,실험조유7례억욱,4례초필저우대조조(16례억욱、13례초필)( P<0.05);실험조환자입원전SAS평분위(48.21±6.14)화대조조상비몰유통계학의의(P>0.05);간예후,실험중수술전SAS평분위(32.11±3.54)저우대조조(P<0.05)。결론:재비뇨외과질병치료과정중,실시림상호리간예능구유효적조절환자적심리상태,대기생활질량야유흔대적촉진화제고,치득추엄사용。
To investigate the clinical effect of nursing intervention on psychological characteristics and quality of life of patients in Department of urology. Methods:100 cases of patients in Department of Urology of our hospital to receive treatment data were analyzed according to the admission time, patients were divided into two groups, each group has 50 patients. The control group general nursing, the experimental group using clinical nursing intervention in nursing, differences are observed and psychological state of the two groups were compared. Results: before intervention, the patients in the experimental group had 34 patients with depression, 26 patients with anxiety when compared with the control group had no statistical significance (P>0.05); after the intervention, the experimental group had 7 cases and 4 cases of depression, anxiety and lower than that of the control group (16 cases, 13 cases of depression and anxiety) (P < 0.05); the experiment group before the patient is admitted to hospital SAS score was (48.21 ± 6.14) compared with the control group had no statistical significance (P>0.05); intervention before operation, the SAS score (32.11 ± 3.54) lower than that of the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: in the Department of urology disease treatment process, the implementation of clinical nursing intervention can effectively regulate the psychological status of the patients, the quality of life also has to promote and improve greatly, is worthy to be popularized.