CAJ | 학술논문

对比分析腹腔镜和开腹手术治疗卵巢囊肿的临床疗效。方法选取162例卵巢囊肿病例资料，随机分为对照组80例患者采用传统开腹手术方法，观察组82例患者采用在腹腔镜下行卵巢囊肿摘除术。分析两组临床疗指标。结果两组在住院天数、手术时间、术中出血量、术后通气时间、并发症、手术成功率方面观察组均优于对照组，具有差异性统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论腹腔镜治疗卵巢囊肿创伤小、出血量少、术后疼痛轻等临床观察指标效果显著，治疗治疗卵巢囊肿的首选方法。
대비분석복강경화개복수술치료란소낭종적림상료효。방법선취162례란소낭종병례자료，수궤분위대조조80례환자채용전통개복수술방법，관찰조82례환자채용재복강경하행란소낭종적제술。분석량조림상료지표。결과량조재주원천수、수술시간、술중출혈량、술후통기시간、병발증、수술성공솔방면관찰조균우우대조조，구유차이성통계학의의(P＜0.05)。결론복강경치료란소낭종창상소、출혈량소、술후동통경등림상관찰지표효과현저，치료치료란소낭종적수선방법。
Objective To compare and analyse the clinical curative effect of laparoscopic and open operation in treatment of ovarian cyst. Methods 162 cases of ovarian cyst were randomly divided into control information, traditional open operation method using the group of 80 patients, 82 cases in observation group were treated by surgery in laparoscopic ovarian cyst resection. Analysis of two groups of clinical curative index. Results of the two groups in hospital stay, operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative ventilation time, complications, operation success rate of observation group was better than the control group, with statistical significance difference (P < 0.05).Conclusion laparoscopic treatment of ovarian cyst smal trauma, less blood loss, postoperative pain and other clinical observation index effect is remarkable, the preferred method for the treatment of treatment of ovarian cysts.