广州医药
廣州醫藥
엄주의약
GUANGZHOU MEDICAL JOURNAL
2014年
5期
26-28
,共3页
吴海东%陈雪梅%黄勇%吴满辉%林小鸿%黄子通
吳海東%陳雪梅%黃勇%吳滿輝%林小鴻%黃子通
오해동%진설매%황용%오만휘%림소홍%황자통
心包积液%心包穿刺%塞尔丁格法
心包積液%心包穿刺%塞爾丁格法
심포적액%심포천자%새이정격법
Pericardial effusion%Pericardiocentesis%Seldinger technique
目的:探讨急诊塞尔丁格(Seldinger)法心包穿刺置管术的疗效及安全性。方法急诊大量心包积液合并有填塞症状的患者23例,按急诊来诊顺序分为常规穿刺组10例、塞尔丁格法组13例,塞尔丁格法组采用塞尔丁格法心包穿刺置管引流术,常规穿刺组采用传统的心包穿刺抽液术治疗,比较两组患者治疗前后症状变化,治疗后超声下心包内积液厚度变化情况,以及手术并发症。结果塞尔丁格法组患者均只行1次穿刺引流术,引流液总量约800~1500ml;常规穿刺组行2~3次穿刺抽液,抽液总量约700~1200ml。塞尔丁格法组患者症状缓解较明显。但两组患者引流术后的生理参数(心率、脉压差、呼吸频率和血氧饱和度)变化无统计学意义。治疗后复查超声示塞尔丁格法组心包内残留液体量少于常规穿刺组(P <0.05)。常规穿刺组术中出现室性早搏3例,塞尔丁格法组未见手术并发症。结论采用塞尔丁格法穿刺置管引流术可有效彻底引流心包内积液,安全性好,值得临床推广应用。
目的:探討急診塞爾丁格(Seldinger)法心包穿刺置管術的療效及安全性。方法急診大量心包積液閤併有填塞癥狀的患者23例,按急診來診順序分為常規穿刺組10例、塞爾丁格法組13例,塞爾丁格法組採用塞爾丁格法心包穿刺置管引流術,常規穿刺組採用傳統的心包穿刺抽液術治療,比較兩組患者治療前後癥狀變化,治療後超聲下心包內積液厚度變化情況,以及手術併髮癥。結果塞爾丁格法組患者均隻行1次穿刺引流術,引流液總量約800~1500ml;常規穿刺組行2~3次穿刺抽液,抽液總量約700~1200ml。塞爾丁格法組患者癥狀緩解較明顯。但兩組患者引流術後的生理參數(心率、脈壓差、呼吸頻率和血氧飽和度)變化無統計學意義。治療後複查超聲示塞爾丁格法組心包內殘留液體量少于常規穿刺組(P <0.05)。常規穿刺組術中齣現室性早搏3例,塞爾丁格法組未見手術併髮癥。結論採用塞爾丁格法穿刺置管引流術可有效徹底引流心包內積液,安全性好,值得臨床推廣應用。
목적:탐토급진새이정격(Seldinger)법심포천자치관술적료효급안전성。방법급진대량심포적액합병유전새증상적환자23례,안급진래진순서분위상규천자조10례、새이정격법조13례,새이정격법조채용새이정격법심포천자치관인류술,상규천자조채용전통적심포천자추액술치료,비교량조환자치료전후증상변화,치료후초성하심포내적액후도변화정황,이급수술병발증。결과새이정격법조환자균지행1차천자인류술,인류액총량약800~1500ml;상규천자조행2~3차천자추액,추액총량약700~1200ml。새이정격법조환자증상완해교명현。단량조환자인류술후적생리삼수(심솔、맥압차、호흡빈솔화혈양포화도)변화무통계학의의。치료후복사초성시새이정격법조심포내잔류액체량소우상규천자조(P <0.05)。상규천자조술중출현실성조박3례,새이정격법조미견수술병발증。결론채용새이정격법천자치관인류술가유효철저인류심포내적액,안전성호,치득림상추엄응용。
Objective To investigative the effectiveness and safety of emergency pericardiocentesis with Seldinger puncture and tube drainage technique for pericardial effusion. Methods 23 emergency patients with large amount of pericardi-al effusion and tamponade symptom were included.In Seldinger's group,1 3 patients were performed with emergency pericardio-centesis with Seldinger puncture and tube drainage technique.In traditional pericardiocentesis (traditional)group,1 0 patients were performed with traditional pericardiocentesis drainage technique.The symptoms of patients,variation in thickness of pericar-dial effusion by ultrasound and complication were compared between the two groups. Results In Seldinger's group,patients were performed with puncture only one time,the gross drainage liquid were about 800 ~1 500ml.In the traditional group,pa-tients were performed with puncture 2 ~3 times,the gross infusion were about 700 ~1 200ml.The tamponed symptom were allevi-ated in the two groups.The changes of physiological parameter (heart rate,pulse pressure difference,respiratory rate,oxyhemo-globin saturation)after operations between the two groups had no statistical difference (P >0.05).The residual liquid checked by ultrasound in the Seldinger's group were less than the traditional group (P <0.05).The Seldinger's group had less complica-tion too. Conclusion Pericardiocentesis with Seldinger puncture and tube drainage technique for pericardial effusion can thor-ough drain liquid,it is worthy of clinical popularization and application for the effect and safety.