CAJ | 학술논문

宪法解释的重要性已经得到了普遍的认可，而在宪法解释方法的历史发展中，存在着两大分支：德国传统和美国传统，二者分别以文义解释和原旨主义为主导性解释方法。虽然两种传统有着诸多差异，但从20世纪以来却出现了趋同的倾向，以重视社会学解释方法为集中表现。在两种传统的差异与趋同中，中国宪法解释可以受到多方面的启示，包括回归宪法文本、期待个案发轫、扩展主体范围和重视社会效果等。
헌법해석적중요성이경득도료보편적인가，이재헌법해석방법적역사발전중，존재착량대분지：덕국전통화미국전통，이자분별이문의해석화원지주의위주도성해석방법。수연량충전통유착제다차이，단종20세기이래각출현료추동적경향，이중시사회학해석방법위집중표현。재량충전통적차이여추동중，중국헌법해석가이수도다방면적계시，포괄회귀헌법문본、기대개안발인、확전주체범위화중시사회효과등。
The importance of constitutional interpretation has been well recognized .There are two tradi-tions of constitutional interpretation in history , namely German tradition and American tradition with literal in-terpretation and originalism as their respective main methods of interpretation .Despite the differences , the two traditions are becoming more and more in common since last century and both concentrate on the sociological interpretation method .The constitutional interpretation in China can be enlightened in many perspectives from their divergence and convergence , such as returning to constitutional text , expecting specific case initiation , expanding scope of subjects and valuing social effects .