癌症进展
癌癥進展
암증진전
ONCOLOGY PROGRESS
2014年
3期
301-304
,共4页
律方%谭锋维%高树庚%牟巨伟%赵峻%薛奇
律方%譚鋒維%高樹庚%牟巨偉%趙峻%薛奇
률방%담봉유%고수경%모거위%조준%설기
食管癌%新辅助放化疗%胸腔镜%腹腔镜%食管切除
食管癌%新輔助放化療%胸腔鏡%腹腔鏡%食管切除
식관암%신보조방화료%흉강경%복강경%식관절제
esophageal cancer%neoadjuvant therapy%thoracoscopy%laparoscopy%esophagectomy
目的:探讨胸腹腔镜联合微创治疗新辅助放化疗食管癌的安全性及可行性。方法回顾分析2012年1月~2013年12月在我院进行新辅助放化疗的35例食管癌患者的临床资料,比较常规三切口手术(常规组)与胸腹腔镜联合微创手术(微创组)的手术时程、术中出血、淋巴结清扫情况、术后引流及围手术期并发症。结果常规组(18例)和微创组(17例)的术后引流量及淋巴结清扫数量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);手术时程及术中出血量方面两组差异具有统计学意义( P<0.05),微创组的手术时程长于开胸组,但术中出血量少于开胸组;两组其他术后观察指标的结果差异无统计学意义( P>0.05);术后并发症主要为呼吸功能障碍、吻合口瘘,两组均无术后严重并发症致死。结论胸、腹腔镜联合微创治疗新辅助放化疗食管癌安全可行,值得深入研究并推广应用。
目的:探討胸腹腔鏡聯閤微創治療新輔助放化療食管癌的安全性及可行性。方法迴顧分析2012年1月~2013年12月在我院進行新輔助放化療的35例食管癌患者的臨床資料,比較常規三切口手術(常規組)與胸腹腔鏡聯閤微創手術(微創組)的手術時程、術中齣血、淋巴結清掃情況、術後引流及圍手術期併髮癥。結果常規組(18例)和微創組(17例)的術後引流量及淋巴結清掃數量差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);手術時程及術中齣血量方麵兩組差異具有統計學意義( P<0.05),微創組的手術時程長于開胸組,但術中齣血量少于開胸組;兩組其他術後觀察指標的結果差異無統計學意義( P>0.05);術後併髮癥主要為呼吸功能障礙、吻閤口瘺,兩組均無術後嚴重併髮癥緻死。結論胸、腹腔鏡聯閤微創治療新輔助放化療食管癌安全可行,值得深入研究併推廣應用。
목적:탐토흉복강경연합미창치료신보조방화료식관암적안전성급가행성。방법회고분석2012년1월~2013년12월재아원진행신보조방화료적35례식관암환자적림상자료,비교상규삼절구수술(상규조)여흉복강경연합미창수술(미창조)적수술시정、술중출혈、림파결청소정황、술후인류급위수술기병발증。결과상규조(18례)화미창조(17례)적술후인류량급림파결청소수량차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);수술시정급술중출혈량방면량조차이구유통계학의의( P<0.05),미창조적수술시정장우개흉조,단술중출혈량소우개흉조;량조기타술후관찰지표적결과차이무통계학의의( P>0.05);술후병발증주요위호흡공능장애、문합구루,량조균무술후엄중병발증치사。결론흉、복강경연합미창치료신보조방화료식관암안전가행,치득심입연구병추엄응용。
Objective To investigate the safety and feasibility of combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer patients administered with neoadjuvant therapy. Method The records of esophageal cancer patients who received neoadjuvant therapy in our hospital between January 2012 and December 2013 were retrospectively analyzed, and the surgery duration, intraoperative bleeding, lymph node clearance, postoperative drainage and perioperative complications between conventional three-incision esophagectomy and the combined thoraco-scopic and laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery were compared. Result For conventional three-incision esophagecto-my group ( Conv. group, 18 cases) and minimally invasive surgery group ( MIS group, 17 cases) , there was no statis-tical difference in post-operative drainage and lymph node clearance ( P>0. 05);while operation duration and intra-oper-ative bleeding were statistically different, MIS took longer time in operation, with less intra-operative bleeding. No differences were seen in other postoperative observations ( P>0. 05 ) . The major postoperative complications included dyspnea and anastomotic leak, and there were no death reports. Conclusion Combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery is safe and feasible for esophageal cancer patients with neoadjuvant therapy and it is worthy of further research and popularization.