中国医药科学
中國醫藥科學
중국의약과학
CHINA MEDICINE AND PHARMACY
2014年
19期
201-202,205
,共3页
顾萍萍%陈玉辉%柯路%童智慧%李维勤
顧萍萍%陳玉輝%柯路%童智慧%李維勤
고평평%진옥휘%가로%동지혜%리유근
重症胰腺炎%充分性液体复苏%限制性液体复苏
重癥胰腺炎%充分性液體複囌%限製性液體複囌
중증이선염%충분성액체복소%한제성액체복소
Severe acute pancreatitis%Aggressive fluid resuscitation%Limited fluid resuscitation
目的:探讨不同液体复苏对重症急性胰腺炎患者预后的影响。方法回顾性分析2009年3月~2012年10月我院SICU 172例重症急性胰腺炎患者的临床资料,根据患者入院后24h内液体复苏量将患者分成A组与B组,各86例。A患者给予充分性液体复苏治疗,B组患者给予限制性液体复苏治疗,比较两组患者的临床治疗效果和预后。结果 A组患者的急性肾损伤(AKI)发生率、AKI持续时间、肌酐峰值及连续肾脏替代疗法(CRRT)使用率均较B组有明显升高,两组比较具有统计学意义(P<0.05);A组患者与B组患者在多器官功能衰竭综合征(MODS)发生率、CRRT使用时间、机械通气率、开腹手术率、住院时间及死亡率等方面无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论对于重症急性胰腺炎患者给予限制性液体复苏能够显著降低患者的AKI发生率和持续时间以及肌酐峰值,减少CRRT的使用率,减少并发症的发生,较充分性液体复苏具有更好的临床疗效,对于重症胰腺炎患者疾病的治疗和预后具有重要的意义。
目的:探討不同液體複囌對重癥急性胰腺炎患者預後的影響。方法迴顧性分析2009年3月~2012年10月我院SICU 172例重癥急性胰腺炎患者的臨床資料,根據患者入院後24h內液體複囌量將患者分成A組與B組,各86例。A患者給予充分性液體複囌治療,B組患者給予限製性液體複囌治療,比較兩組患者的臨床治療效果和預後。結果 A組患者的急性腎損傷(AKI)髮生率、AKI持續時間、肌酐峰值及連續腎髒替代療法(CRRT)使用率均較B組有明顯升高,兩組比較具有統計學意義(P<0.05);A組患者與B組患者在多器官功能衰竭綜閤徵(MODS)髮生率、CRRT使用時間、機械通氣率、開腹手術率、住院時間及死亡率等方麵無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論對于重癥急性胰腺炎患者給予限製性液體複囌能夠顯著降低患者的AKI髮生率和持續時間以及肌酐峰值,減少CRRT的使用率,減少併髮癥的髮生,較充分性液體複囌具有更好的臨床療效,對于重癥胰腺炎患者疾病的治療和預後具有重要的意義。
목적:탐토불동액체복소대중증급성이선염환자예후적영향。방법회고성분석2009년3월~2012년10월아원SICU 172례중증급성이선염환자적림상자료,근거환자입원후24h내액체복소량장환자분성A조여B조,각86례。A환자급여충분성액체복소치료,B조환자급여한제성액체복소치료,비교량조환자적림상치료효과화예후。결과 A조환자적급성신손상(AKI)발생솔、AKI지속시간、기항봉치급련속신장체대요법(CRRT)사용솔균교B조유명현승고,량조비교구유통계학의의(P<0.05);A조환자여B조환자재다기관공능쇠갈종합정(MODS)발생솔、CRRT사용시간、궤계통기솔、개복수술솔、주원시간급사망솔등방면무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론대우중증급성이선염환자급여한제성액체복소능구현저강저환자적AKI발생솔화지속시간이급기항봉치,감소CRRT적사용솔,감소병발증적발생,교충분성액체복소구유경호적림상료효,대우중증이선염환자질병적치료화예후구유중요적의의。
Objective To explore the effect of different ways of fluid resuscitation on the prognosis of patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Methods Clinical data of 172 patients with severe acute pancreatitis who were admitted to our hospital from March 2009 to October 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. They were allocated to two groups, group A and group B, according to the amount of fluid resuscitation within 24 hours after admission, with 86 patients in each group. Patients in group A received the treatment of aggressive fluid resuscitation, and the patients in group B received the treatment of limited fluid resuscitation. Clinical efficacy and prognosis were compared between the two groups. Results Incidence of AKI, duration of AKI, peak value of creatinine and application rate of CRRT in group A were all significantly higher or longer than those in group B, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05); differences of incidence of MODS, application time of CRRT, mechanical ventilation rate, laparotomy rate, hospitalization time and mortality rate between the two groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusion For patients with severe acute pancreatitis, limited fluid resuscitation helps significantly reduce the incidence and duration of AKI and peak value of creatinine, lower the application rate of CRRT and prevent complications, which has a better clinical efficacy than that of aggressive fluid resuscitation and is of great significance in the treatment and prognosis for patients with severe pancreatitis.