CAJ | 학술논문

本文针对目前两种基于OFDM的窄带PLC通信协议PRIME和G3-PLC中的路由机制进行了对比。PRIME协议中采用基于树状网的集中式与分布式结合的路由机制，G3-PLC协议中采用基于Mesh网络拓扑结构的Load路由协议进行网络路由。经分析对比可知，具有自组织、自愈、多跳式等特定的mesh网络拓扑结构下，采用基于Load的路由协议，对于电力通信的动态和时变特性更能体现鲁棒性。因此，G3-PLC路由机制在我国国网环境下更具有优势。
본문침대목전량충기우OFDM적착대PLC통신협의PRIME화G3-PLC중적로유궤제진행료대비。PRIME협의중채용기우수상망적집중식여분포식결합적로유궤제，G3-PLC협의중채용기우Mesh망락탁복결구적Load로유협의진행망락로유。경분석대비가지，구유자조직、자유、다도식등특정적mesh망락탁복결구하，채용기우Load적로유협의，대우전력통신적동태화시변특성경능체현로봉성。인차，G3-PLC로유궤제재아국국망배경하경구유우세。
The present work analyzes and compares two popular standards' routing mechanisms for data transmission based on OFDM narrowband PLC communications: PRIME and G3-PLC. PRIME protocol uses a routing mechanism for tree-based centralized and distributed networks combined, G3-PLC protocol uses Load network routing protocol based on Mesh network topology. The comparison shows that, for the dynamic and time-varying characteristics of the power of communication, based on Load Mesh routing protocol used in the network topology better reflect the robustness. So, G3-PLC routing mechanism has an advantage in our national network environmental.