山西职工医学院学报
山西職工醫學院學報
산서직공의학원학보
JOURNAL OF SHANXI MEDICAL COLLEGE FOR CONTINUING EDUCATION
2014年
3期
20-23
,共4页
杨继虎%杨晓棠%任基伟%郑芳%王秀云
楊繼虎%楊曉棠%任基偉%鄭芳%王秀雲
양계호%양효당%임기위%정방%왕수운
结肠癌%分级%X线计算机%体层摄影术
結腸癌%分級%X線計算機%體層攝影術
결장암%분급%X선계산궤%체층섭영술
colon cancer%classification%X-ray computer%tomography
目的:应用多排螺旋CT三期增强扫描,探讨结肠癌分级的可行性。方法:收集术后有病理结果的结肠癌病例57例,其中腺癌2级45例,腺癌3级12例。采用GE Discovery CT 750 HD扫描仪。行平扫、动脉期、门静脉期、延时期增强扫描。分别测量各期CT值,进行统计学分析。结果:平扫腺癌2级与腺癌3级平均CT值基本相同。动脉期平均CT值腺癌2级略高于腺癌3级。门静脉期和延时期平均CT值腺癌2级略低于腺癌3级。两者门静脉期和延时期平均CT值均高于动脉期。三期增强CT值与主动脉CT值比较,动脉期差值腺癌2级小于腺癌3级,差异无统计学意义( P﹥0.05);门静脉期差值和延时期差值腺癌2级高于腺癌3级,差异无统计学意义(P﹥0.05)。结论:三期增强扫描对腺癌2级和3级的鉴别在门静脉期和延时期平均CT值得到证实,而在动脉期平均CT值比较时未得到证实。三期强化后CT值与主动脉CT值的差值比较时,未能得到统计学证实,有待于进一步完善研究方法。
目的:應用多排螺鏇CT三期增彊掃描,探討結腸癌分級的可行性。方法:收集術後有病理結果的結腸癌病例57例,其中腺癌2級45例,腺癌3級12例。採用GE Discovery CT 750 HD掃描儀。行平掃、動脈期、門靜脈期、延時期增彊掃描。分彆測量各期CT值,進行統計學分析。結果:平掃腺癌2級與腺癌3級平均CT值基本相同。動脈期平均CT值腺癌2級略高于腺癌3級。門靜脈期和延時期平均CT值腺癌2級略低于腺癌3級。兩者門靜脈期和延時期平均CT值均高于動脈期。三期增彊CT值與主動脈CT值比較,動脈期差值腺癌2級小于腺癌3級,差異無統計學意義( P﹥0.05);門靜脈期差值和延時期差值腺癌2級高于腺癌3級,差異無統計學意義(P﹥0.05)。結論:三期增彊掃描對腺癌2級和3級的鑒彆在門靜脈期和延時期平均CT值得到證實,而在動脈期平均CT值比較時未得到證實。三期彊化後CT值與主動脈CT值的差值比較時,未能得到統計學證實,有待于進一步完善研究方法。
목적:응용다배라선CT삼기증강소묘,탐토결장암분급적가행성。방법:수집술후유병리결과적결장암병례57례,기중선암2급45례,선암3급12례。채용GE Discovery CT 750 HD소묘의。행평소、동맥기、문정맥기、연시기증강소묘。분별측량각기CT치,진행통계학분석。결과:평소선암2급여선암3급평균CT치기본상동。동맥기평균CT치선암2급략고우선암3급。문정맥기화연시기평균CT치선암2급략저우선암3급。량자문정맥기화연시기평균CT치균고우동맥기。삼기증강CT치여주동맥CT치비교,동맥기차치선암2급소우선암3급,차이무통계학의의( P﹥0.05);문정맥기차치화연시기차치선암2급고우선암3급,차이무통계학의의(P﹥0.05)。결론:삼기증강소묘대선암2급화3급적감별재문정맥기화연시기평균CT치득도증실,이재동맥기평균CT치비교시미득도증실。삼기강화후CT치여주동맥CT치적차치비교시,미능득도통계학증실,유대우진일보완선연구방법。
Objective:To discuss the feasibility of colon cancer classification by applying three periods enhanced MSCT scan. Methods:57 cases of colon cancer with pathological results were collected,including 45 cases of levelⅡadenocarcinoma and 12 cases of levelⅢadenocarcinoma. GE Discovery CT 750HD scanner was used for line scan,ar-terial,portal venous phase scan and delayed scan. CT values of every period were measured and carried on the statistical analysis. Results:Average CT value of levelⅡ adenocarcinoma was basically similar to level Ⅲadenocarcinoma at the time of line scan and delayed period,but levelⅡwas slightly higher than the levelⅢat the time of arterial period;levelⅡwas slightly lower than the level Ⅲat the time of portal venous period and delayed period. Average CT value of them at the time of portal venous phase and delayed period were higher than arterial period. After compared enhanced CT val-ue of three periods with aortic CT value,it turned out that average CT value difference of levelⅡadenocarcinoma was less than levelⅢ. There was not the statistically significant difference( P﹥0 . 05 ). LevelⅡadenocarcinoma was higher than levelⅢ at the time of portal venous and delayed period. There was not statistically significant difference too( P﹥0 . 05 ). Conclusion:Average CT value of portal venous phase and delayed period of LevelⅡand Ⅲadenocarcinoma is not significantly confirmed to distiguish them,while neither is the average CT value of arterial period and difference of ev-ery phase CT value and the aorta CT,which is waiting for further perfect inspection methods.