脊柱外科杂志
脊柱外科雜誌
척주외과잡지
JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY
2014年
3期
176-179
,共4页
张竞%蒋雷生%邵将%王宇仁%蒋盛旦
張競%蔣雷生%邵將%王宇仁%蔣盛旦
장경%장뢰생%소장%왕우인%장성단
胸椎%腰椎%脊柱骨折%内固定器%手术期间
胸椎%腰椎%脊柱骨摺%內固定器%手術期間
흉추%요추%척주골절%내고정기%수술기간
Thoracic vertebrae%Lumbar vertebrae%Spinal fractures%Internal fixators%Intraoperative period
目的:评价闭合复位经皮椎弓根螺钉固定治疗胸腰段骨折的临床应用价值。方法研究对象为本院2011年1月~2013年1月收治的连续43例AO分类为A1、A2型胸腰段骨折患者,分别行腰椎后路开放复位椎弓根螺钉固定手术和腰椎闭合复位经皮椎弓根螺钉固定手术。2组患者年龄、骨折分布无差异。回顾性分析比较2组患者手术时间、出血量、切口长度、住院天数、疼痛视觉模拟量表( visual analogue scale , VAS)评分。术前、术后摄腰椎正侧位X线片,比较2组患者伤椎高度、伤椎Cobb角。结果2组患者手术时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);经皮手术组患者术中出血量、术后引流量、平均住院天数、切口长度明显小于开放手术组( P<0.05),术后VAS评分明显少于开放手术组(P<0.05)。2组手术在矫正伤椎高度及伤椎Cobb角能力方面相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论腰椎闭合复位经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定手术治疗AO分类为A1、A2型胸腰段骨折具有手术创伤小、术后恢复快的优点,其矫形能力与开放复位椎弓根螺钉内固定术相当。
目的:評價閉閤複位經皮椎弓根螺釘固定治療胸腰段骨摺的臨床應用價值。方法研究對象為本院2011年1月~2013年1月收治的連續43例AO分類為A1、A2型胸腰段骨摺患者,分彆行腰椎後路開放複位椎弓根螺釘固定手術和腰椎閉閤複位經皮椎弓根螺釘固定手術。2組患者年齡、骨摺分佈無差異。迴顧性分析比較2組患者手術時間、齣血量、切口長度、住院天數、疼痛視覺模擬量錶( visual analogue scale , VAS)評分。術前、術後攝腰椎正側位X線片,比較2組患者傷椎高度、傷椎Cobb角。結果2組患者手術時間差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);經皮手術組患者術中齣血量、術後引流量、平均住院天數、切口長度明顯小于開放手術組( P<0.05),術後VAS評分明顯少于開放手術組(P<0.05)。2組手術在矯正傷椎高度及傷椎Cobb角能力方麵相比差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論腰椎閉閤複位經皮椎弓根螺釘內固定手術治療AO分類為A1、A2型胸腰段骨摺具有手術創傷小、術後恢複快的優點,其矯形能力與開放複位椎弓根螺釘內固定術相噹。
목적:평개폐합복위경피추궁근라정고정치료흉요단골절적림상응용개치。방법연구대상위본원2011년1월~2013년1월수치적련속43례AO분류위A1、A2형흉요단골절환자,분별행요추후로개방복위추궁근라정고정수술화요추폐합복위경피추궁근라정고정수술。2조환자년령、골절분포무차이。회고성분석비교2조환자수술시간、출혈량、절구장도、주원천수、동통시각모의량표( visual analogue scale , VAS)평분。술전、술후섭요추정측위X선편,비교2조환자상추고도、상추Cobb각。결과2조환자수술시간차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);경피수술조환자술중출혈량、술후인류량、평균주원천수、절구장도명현소우개방수술조( P<0.05),술후VAS평분명현소우개방수술조(P<0.05)。2조수술재교정상추고도급상추Cobb각능력방면상비차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론요추폐합복위경피추궁근라정내고정수술치료AO분류위A1、A2형흉요단골절구유수술창상소、술후회복쾌적우점,기교형능력여개방복위추궁근라정내고정술상당。
Objective To evaluate the clinical result of the percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoraco -lumbar fractures by comparing with the open reduction and pedicle screw fixation .Methods A retrospective study of a con-secutive 43 patients with Type A1 and A2 thoracolumbar fractures according to the AO classification , which had been fixed by pedicle screws through the posterior approach from January 2011 to January 2013.The patients were divided into 2 groups ran-domly .Twenty-two patients were treated with the posterior open reduction and pedicle screw fixation and 21 patients performed the closed reduction and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation .The data of the incision size , blood loss, duration of operation, hospital stay and visual analogue scale ( VAS) scores in 2 groups were compared .The fractured vertebral body angle and ante-rior vertebral body height of the 2 groups respectively were evaluated .Results All patients were followed up for 3-12 months (average 8.5 months) .All the perioperative data was significantly less in the percutaneous pedicle screw fixation group (P<0.05) except that the duration of operation was equal in 2 groups.There was no significant difference in all the radiological assessment including the Cobb ’s angle of fractured vertebral and anterior vertebral body height (P>0.05).Conclusion The Type A1 and A2 thoracolumbar fracture patients treated with closed reduction and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation has less surrounding tissue damage and can recover more quickly .The ability of correcting deformity by using closed reduction and per-cutaneous pedicle screw fixation is equal to the open operation in the Type A 1 and A2 thoracolumbar fracture .