国际医药卫生导报
國際醫藥衛生導報
국제의약위생도보
INTERNATIONAL MEDICINE & HEALTH GUIDANCE NEWS
2014年
7期
1033-1035
,共3页
郑金芳%陈玉霞%陈雪莲%梁洁莲%莫惠霞%陈清
鄭金芳%陳玉霞%陳雪蓮%樑潔蓮%莫惠霞%陳清
정금방%진옥하%진설련%량길련%막혜하%진청
显微器械%手工刷洗%清洗消毒机%清洗质量
顯微器械%手工刷洗%清洗消毒機%清洗質量
현미기계%수공쇄세%청세소독궤%청세질량
Microsurgical instruments%Hand washing%Cleaning and disinfecting machines%Clean quality
目的 探讨不同清洗方法对眼科显微器械清洗效果的影响.方法 选择眼科手术后显微器械900件,按日期单双数随机分为实验组、对照1组及对照2组各300件,实验组采用手工初洗加多酶机洗,对照1组采用手工刷洗,对照2组采用多酶机洗,比较三组器械的清洗质量.结果 三组器械清洗后,目测法检查合格率均为100%;放大镜精细检测发现实验组、对照1组合格率为100%,对照2组合格率为96.3%;采用中国疾病预防控制中心推荐的ATP生物荧光测定法检测,实验组、对照1组合格率为99.7%,对照2组合格率为66.3%,实验组、对照1组清洗质量均优于对照2组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01).结论 清洗方法与眼科显微器械清洁质量密切相关,采用手工初洗加多酶机洗的方法可有效保证清洗效果,有利于器械保养.
目的 探討不同清洗方法對眼科顯微器械清洗效果的影響.方法 選擇眼科手術後顯微器械900件,按日期單雙數隨機分為實驗組、對照1組及對照2組各300件,實驗組採用手工初洗加多酶機洗,對照1組採用手工刷洗,對照2組採用多酶機洗,比較三組器械的清洗質量.結果 三組器械清洗後,目測法檢查閤格率均為100%;放大鏡精細檢測髮現實驗組、對照1組閤格率為100%,對照2組閤格率為96.3%;採用中國疾病預防控製中心推薦的ATP生物熒光測定法檢測,實驗組、對照1組閤格率為99.7%,對照2組閤格率為66.3%,實驗組、對照1組清洗質量均優于對照2組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.01).結論 清洗方法與眼科顯微器械清潔質量密切相關,採用手工初洗加多酶機洗的方法可有效保證清洗效果,有利于器械保養.
목적 탐토불동청세방법대안과현미기계청세효과적영향.방법 선택안과수술후현미기계900건,안일기단쌍수수궤분위실험조、대조1조급대조2조각300건,실험조채용수공초세가다매궤세,대조1조채용수공쇄세,대조2조채용다매궤세,비교삼조기계적청세질량.결과 삼조기계청세후,목측법검사합격솔균위100%;방대경정세검측발현실험조、대조1조합격솔위100%,대조2조합격솔위96.3%;채용중국질병예방공제중심추천적ATP생물형광측정법검측,실험조、대조1조합격솔위99.7%,대조2조합격솔위66.3%,실험조、대조1조청세질량균우우대조2조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.01).결론 청세방법여안과현미기계청길질량밀절상관,채용수공초세가다매궤세적방법가유효보증청세효과,유리우기계보양.
Objective To investigate the effects of different cleaning methods for cleaning ophthalmic microsurgical instruments.Methods We selected 900 pieces of ophthalmic microsurgical instruments,which were randomly divided into experimental group and control group Ⅰ and control group 2 by date of odd and even number (n=300),hand scrub and multi-enzyme machine washable were used in the experimental group,the control group 1 used hand brushing,while multi-enzyme machine wash used in control group 2,then compare the quality of cleaning in the three groups.Results After cleaning equipment,by visual observation checking the passing rate was 100% in the three groups; magnifier fine detected 100% passing rate in the experimental group and the control group 1,while it was passing rate of 96.3% in the control group 2; using ATP bioluminescence assay to detect,with a pass rate of 99.7% in the experimental group and the control group 1,with a pass rate of 66.3% in the control group 2,experimental group and the control group 1 were superior in cleaning quality than control group 2,while the experimental group was more obvious,the difference was statistically significant,P < 0.01.Conclusion Hand scrub and multi-enzyme machine wash can ensure the cleaning effect effectively,which is conducive to equipment maintenance.