CAJ | 학술논문

传统的地球化学异常评序方法，通常依据化探异常的“高、大、全”，但实践证明，没有结合成矿地质条件进行排序的异常，不能更好地反映出成矿远景的大小，也就不能更好地进行异常查证工作。为此，这里把异常规模、元素组合特征以及成矿地质条件作为评价异常最重要的三个参数，使用模糊意见集中决策对研究区的异常作出排序。经野外异常查证工作证实，该方法能更好地指导异常查证工作。
전통적지구화학이상평서방법，통상의거화탐이상적“고、대、전”，단실천증명，몰유결합성광지질조건진행배서적이상，불능경호지반영출성광원경적대소，야취불능경호지진행이상사증공작。위차，저리파이상규모、원소조합특정이급성광지질조건작위평개이상최중요적삼개삼수，사용모호의견집중결책대연구구적이상작출배서。경야외이상사증공작증실，해방법능경호지지도이상사증공작。
The traditional methods of geochemical anomaly ranking are usually based on anomaly parameters,but it is proved that potential areas can't be expressed actually and anomaly inspection can't be arranged reasonably without combination of ore-forming geological conditions.We put anomaly dimension,element combination characteristic,ore-forming geological condi-tions as the three most important parameters of anomaly evaluation,and make anomaly ranking with centralized decision meth-od of the fuzzy opinion.Field anomaly inspection work confirmed this method.