皖南医学院学报
皖南醫學院學報
환남의학원학보
ACTA ACADEMIAE MEDICINAE WANNAN
2014年
4期
311-313
,共3页
腰椎融合术%邻近节段退变%腰椎间盘突出
腰椎融閤術%鄰近節段退變%腰椎間盤突齣
요추융합술%린근절단퇴변%요추간반돌출
lumbar fusion%adjacent segment degeneration%lumbar disc protrusion
目的:探讨单节段与多节段腰椎融合术后邻近节段退变的临床观察。方法:选取2007年5月~2011年8月在我科诊疗并接受腰椎融合术的61例病例,根据手术方式不同,主要分为单节段组和多节段组。通过测量椎间隙高度JOA评分、Prolo功能评分以及Pfirrmann评分系统,对患者术前、术后以及2年后随访的情况进行评分。结果:两组术后JOA评分、Prolo功能评分明显优于术前,但在末次随访评分中,多节段组明显高于单节段组(P<0.05);末次随访多节段组患者上、下邻近节段的Pfirrmann评分均明显高于单节段组,而椎间隙高度则明显小于单节段组(P<0.05)。结论:腰椎融合术治疗效果显著,多节段融合术后邻近节段较单节段融合术更易发生退变,选择合适的手术方式可提升治疗效果,改善患者生活质量。
目的:探討單節段與多節段腰椎融閤術後鄰近節段退變的臨床觀察。方法:選取2007年5月~2011年8月在我科診療併接受腰椎融閤術的61例病例,根據手術方式不同,主要分為單節段組和多節段組。通過測量椎間隙高度JOA評分、Prolo功能評分以及Pfirrmann評分繫統,對患者術前、術後以及2年後隨訪的情況進行評分。結果:兩組術後JOA評分、Prolo功能評分明顯優于術前,但在末次隨訪評分中,多節段組明顯高于單節段組(P<0.05);末次隨訪多節段組患者上、下鄰近節段的Pfirrmann評分均明顯高于單節段組,而椎間隙高度則明顯小于單節段組(P<0.05)。結論:腰椎融閤術治療效果顯著,多節段融閤術後鄰近節段較單節段融閤術更易髮生退變,選擇閤適的手術方式可提升治療效果,改善患者生活質量。
목적:탐토단절단여다절단요추융합술후린근절단퇴변적림상관찰。방법:선취2007년5월~2011년8월재아과진료병접수요추융합술적61례병례,근거수술방식불동,주요분위단절단조화다절단조。통과측량추간극고도JOA평분、Prolo공능평분이급Pfirrmann평분계통,대환자술전、술후이급2년후수방적정황진행평분。결과:량조술후JOA평분、Prolo공능평분명현우우술전,단재말차수방평분중,다절단조명현고우단절단조(P<0.05);말차수방다절단조환자상、하린근절단적Pfirrmann평분균명현고우단절단조,이추간극고도칙명현소우단절단조(P<0.05)。결론:요추융합술치료효과현저,다절단융합술후린근절단교단절단융합술경역발생퇴변,선택합괄적수술방식가제승치료효과,개선환자생활질량。
Objective:To observe the incidence of adjacent segment degeneration after single or multi-segmental lumbar fusion surgery .Methods:Sixty-one patients undergone lumbar fusion for degenerative disease between May 2007 and August 2011 in our department were allocated to treatment group with single-level arthrodesis or multi-segment fusion on the treatment policy basis .The impacts on the incidence of adjacent segment degeneration were evaluated by comparing the total scores with the two groups concerning the height of intervertebral space measured ,Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA) scoring, Prolo functional scale and Pfirrmann score before and after surgery as well as conditions in two years of follow-up.Results:The postoperative scores for JOA and Prolo function were significantly better than those before surgery ,yet the scores by the final follow-up were better in group with multiple segment fusion than those treated with single-level arthrodesis(P<0.05).In addition,final follow-up of patients with multiple segment interventions showed higher scores by Pfirrmann scoring assessment of the adjacent segments and better improved intervertebral space as compared with those treated with single segment fu -sion(P<0.05).Conclusion:Lumbar fusion intervention can significantly improve the adjacent level degeneration,yet multi-level fusion may predispose to incidence of adjacent segment degeneration than the single-level arthrodesis.Thus,appropriate treatment policy is important for successful outcomes and improvement of the life quality of patients with such entity .